Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2010 3:11:54 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1
“Why are they limiting solar power, when the sun is unlimited?”

Because money isn't....
2 posted on 03/09/2010 3:13:34 AM PST by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Going green means a scam...


4 posted on 03/09/2010 3:20:13 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

At this point in time, only the greedy or the dense are for solar electricity en masse.


5 posted on 03/09/2010 3:20:42 AM PST by qwertypie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Whilst I generally agree with the articles conclusions about the unfavorable economics of solar energy at present, the NYT writer seems to be perpetually mired in a myopic world where government “policy”, subsidies, and incentives are the make-or-break variables, not good old fashioned profits and the economics of competition. I guess it's hard to change course when you've been the leading cheer leading paper for socialism in the free world for over seventy years.
9 posted on 03/09/2010 3:39:37 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
the city set out to replace its failing coal economy

Failing per government mandate. First they starve the people out then they subsidize them.

That people cannot see the relationship is a testament to the effectiveness of government schooling.

10 posted on 03/09/2010 3:50:56 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

ping


12 posted on 03/09/2010 4:19:16 AM PST by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
To the extent that these technologies can be used in rural pockets to either supplement or defer the extension of costly cross country transmission facilities they certainly have reached an efficiency level to play a part.

But those that expect to stick up windmills, lay out some panels without regard, as Spain apparently did, to technology quality and efficiency, and eschew the 'grid', will be, some time to come, disappointed.

13 posted on 03/09/2010 4:22:29 AM PST by n230099
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Sacramento, CA is actually a good place for solar power for one reason: enough cloudless days in summer to make solar panels reasonably viable (I see a lot of houses in nearby Davis, CA with solar panels on the roof). This isn’t like the Bay Area, where the low clouds and rolling fog in the summer can cut the efficiency of solar panels quite a bit.


14 posted on 03/09/2010 4:46:17 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

You mean....the govt can’t just “create” green jobs by law?


15 posted on 03/09/2010 5:11:08 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

when the sun is unlimited?”.....

In my corner of the world, the sun sets, for example, disappears for 12 hours a day.....the sun is not unlimited!!!


17 posted on 03/09/2010 5:27:39 AM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson