1 posted on
03/02/2010 4:29:22 PM PST by
GOP_Lady
To: 506Lake; AdvisorB; antivenom; angry elephant; Blonde; BornToBeAmerican; BroJoeK; ...
|
To be added or removed from the "The Wall Street Journal" Ping List, FReepmail GOP_Lady. |
2 posted on
03/02/2010 4:29:49 PM PST by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
This is gonna make a lot of "progressives" in Massachusetts...including many,many police chiefs (who decide who gets a firearms permit here)...very,very sad.
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!
4 posted on
03/02/2010 4:33:31 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
To: GOP_Lady
i have a question about this and i am fully aware that it could result in flamage. but this is a serious quest for understanding .... sooo.... how would this ruling affect states rights issues? i know some states are pushing 10th amendment legislation to reassert their sovereign rights, would the feds be able to say..”hey, if our constitution says everyone has to play by the federal rules on the 2nd amendment, then everyone has to play by the federal rules on everything.” could they use this as a means to squash states rights? or would it help to facilitate the states rights push?
8 posted on
03/02/2010 4:58:25 PM PST by
madamemayhem
(defeat isn't getting knocked down, it's not getting back up)
To: GOP_Lady
Do you think the drop in the DC murder rate may influence this decision?
To: GOP_Lady
Plaintiff Otis McDonald... from Chicago:)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson