Posted on 02/28/2010 6:36:58 AM PST by Beckwith
As you folks know, I have spent the last two years researching the life and times of the ObamaMessiah, and today I just learned something new. Barack Obama's birth certificate was destroyed in a fire.
In an article, entitled, "Obama 'Birther' Row Rears Its Head Again," Greg Milam, identified as a "U. S correspondent" for Sky News, the British version of Fox News, has just introduced a whole new reason for Obama not presenting his birth certificate to confirm his eligibility -- it was burned in a fire! -- poor Barack -- everything seems to happen to him.
Milam correctly claims, "The White House has consistently dismissed the issue (of Obama's eligibility)."
Of course they did. After all, what can they say? You couldn't get a driver's license with the three pieces of documentation that Obama has released to establish his eligibility: his autobiography, a Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth," and two old newspaper clippings.
Then, Milan claims that, "Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama's birth...."
This statement is completely false. No Hawaiian authority, at any time, has ever claimed that Hawaii provided, any one of the THREE evolving copies of Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB), that, over time, were posted on the Internet by Obama's co-conspirators at the left-wing Annenberg FactCheck.com. I challenge anyone to produce a statement from any Hawaiian official confirming Milan's assertion. It never happened.
But this statement takes the cake! "...because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire which wiped out much of the state's archives."
Whoaaa Nelly! Where in the world did Milam get that one? Google -- Hawaii archive fire -- yourself. See! Never happened -- but I guess if Milan wrote that Obama's dog ate it, no one would believe it.
Let's take a look at Obama's bona fides:
1. A supposed "autobiography," that Obama acknowledges is full of pseudonyms, composite characters, approximated dialogue, and events out of chronological order -- and outright lies. The life presented in the book is a myth. Most of what you think you know about Obama comes from this piece of fiction -- and most of what you think you know just ain't so.
2. The "birth announcements" from two Hawaiian newspapers prove nothing. They could be real as can be, or forgeries. It doesn't matter. There isn't a court in the country that would accept two old newspaper clippings as evidence of anything. Those two old newspaper clippings are hearsay.
3. And the bogus COLB is the biggest joke of all. Only the conspirators know where the three COLBs came from. They didn't come from Hawaii. Beyond that, as discrepancies in the document were identified, the document evolved, like everything else about Obama's life narrative.
In this image rich file, a genealogist associated with a leading genealogy website, documents the evolution of the FactCheck.org images:
Forgery #1 - The COLB posted on 'Fight the Smears' -- No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery. Debunked by Ron Polirak, Sandra Ramsey Lines, and the author of this document, among others.
Forgery #2 - FactCheck - Two different COLB's one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL.
Forgery #3 - FactCheck - COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.
So, how can there be three versions of a document that Hawaii NEVER issued?
More propaganda
Maybe the dog ate his birth certificate and then the dog was destroyed in a fire.
No, no, no, the dog STOLE the birth certificate from the official files, used it for rolling paper, lit a joint, and accidentally set the archives on fire.
The dog, unable to find an exit due to it’s hallucinogenic haze, tragically died in that fire.
See? Always a reasonable explanation for these sort of things.
Bush’s Fault.
Authorities in Hawaii.Or as everyone else calls them friends of Soros.
There was nothing about a fire, when the State of Hawaii was digitizing the records. There are safe guards in keeping these documents.
What a pathetic lie and attempted cover-up.
Seems somewhat coincidental and of a suspicious timing that Obama is offering to build a 1 Billion dollar US embassy in London, with a moat no less.
A little bit of bribery if the UK papers would just “back off” of the birther issue?
Undoubtedly there are intelligence assets there that have some form of physical evidence that threatens Obama.
Maybe the dog started the fire? I’m just saying...
the Brits wouldn’t crown their next King of all he had was a COLB- and he is just an entertainer
Buncha wankers!
My Mom’s birth cert was destroyed in a REAL fire in California. She was able to obtain a BC through the previous census information her father had signed and returned to the govt. listing her and her brothers and sisters. Does O show up on any census forms?
Yeah, I saw that article that mentioned it being destroyed in a fire. It was mentioned in his ‘wonderful’ book though. His book said he had it.
What a liar! What a farce!
“This statement is completely false. No Hawaiian authority, at any time, has ever claimed that Hawaii provided, any one of the THREE evolving copies of Obama’s Certification of Live Birth (COLB), that, over time, were posted on the Internet by Obama’s co-conspirators at the left-wing Annenberg FactCheck.com. I challenge anyone to produce a statement from any Hawaiian official confirming Milan's assertion. It never happened.”
Politifact actually has Okubo on the record denying that the electronic COLB image provided by the Obama campaign can be authenticated by her or by anyone at DHOH! But that was only in a follow-up to their initial story where Okubo said the COLB was a valid HI BC.
From the St. Petersburg Times Politifact:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/
Politifact describes the controversy that erupted from their initial story:
"When the birth certificate arrived from the Obama campaign it confirmed his name as the other documents already showed it. Still, we took an extra step: We e-mailed it to the Hawaii Department of Health, which maintains such records, to ask if it was real.
"'It's a valid Hawaii state birth certificate,' spokesman Janice Okubo told us.
"Then the firestorm started."
After the "firestorm," Politifact apparently conducted a follow-up interview with Okubo which shows that what Okubo meant was that the Obama COLB only appeared to be be a valid HI BC, but she could not and did not "verify" that it was a valid HI BC:
Politifact:
"Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.
"And about the copy we e-mailed her for verification? 'When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.'"
"Still, she acknowledges: 'I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.'"
No, it wasn’t destroyed in a fire, but it was lost for good as a result of the February 27 tsunami caused by the earthquake in Chile. Fortunately there was little other damage in Hawaii from the tsunami...just the building where the birth certificates are kept was flooded.
Spokesbabe Okubo is funny. She had to back off her original claim. And a good thing ... she originally said Obama’s alleged COLB was real because it looked like her own. IOW, she used no formal technique to verify its accuracy. She relied on no official record to verify its accuracy. She just thought it looked like hers. At best, she follows up with a second-hand anecdote, “... our registrar ... thought he could see pieces of the embossed image ...” Really?? Nobody else could. What a joke.
The worse part is that even after Okubo admits she can’t confirm the allged COLB as real, Politifact still took as set in stone that the COLB was real. Baffles the mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.