Posted on 02/26/2010 4:23:54 AM PST by Kaslin
One thing is clear from the Healthcare Summit at the Blair House today: the President Congressional Democrats are more committed than ever to forcing their healthcare takeover on a resistant citizenry. The latest iteration of the monstrous healthcare legislation contains much of the same budget gimmickry, tax increases and government control as previous versions. Just when Americans thought they had killed Obamacare, it came roaring back to life, and with an even fiercer determination to live.
But the healthcare battle isn’t just raging in Washington, D.C. California’s State Senate recently passed SB 810, the newest version of universal healthcare to be debated in the state’s legislature.
For good or bad, California has long been a leader in progressive government policy. One of the largest states in the union, its economy is the size of a small country itself. Laws and policies in California govern 37 million Americans. So it’s no wonder that many of the ideas tried on the Left Coast make their way east to Washington, D.C. It can be either a curse or a blessing, but what happens in California doesn’t stay in California.
For the past five years, the Assembly and Senate have introduced, debated and sometimes passed some form of universal healthcare legislation. Two years ago director Michael Moore even visited the state capitol to testify in favor of that year’s version of socialized medicine. But every year the healthcare bill has been passed by the legislature, the governor has prudently vetoed it.
The California legislature’s passage of socialized medicine in a year where the issue is wildly unpopular nationwide shows just how out of touch California’s elected officials have become. A recent Rasmussen poll on the national healthcare reform bill showed 58% of Americans oppose the plan. And Americans, unlike their representatives, understand the right priorities for the nation right now; the Rasmussen poll also found that 61% of Americans want Congress to drop the healthcare issue and focus on jobs and the economy.
California’s economic problems are even worse than the rest of the nation. Standard & Poor’s recently downgraded the state’s credit rating to an A-, the lowest of any state in the country. The unemployment rate in California now tops 12%, not including those who have stopped looking for jobs, which could raise the rate to as high as 20%.
And California’s perennial budget deficit is continuing to worsen. State Controller John Chiang reported recently that the state will be out of money by April. But California Democrats continue on with their agenda, heedless of the carnage they leave in their spendthrift wake.
SB 810’s single-payer healthcare system is estimated to cost California $200 billion dollars. It’s a mind-boggling price tag, especially considering the state faces a $20 billion budget deficit that will require more state spending cuts. And emphasizes the reckless behavior of legislators who would pass a healthcare bill at a time when the state is almost bankrupt. But these numbers don’t seem to matter to the irresponsible Democrats who have spent California’s wealth and driven away its wealth-producing talent.
Only one Democrat was sensible enough to join Republicans in voting against SB 810, Senator Lou Correa from Orange County. He explained that his priority is “jobs, jobs, jobs, and not some bill without details. I do believe we need health care reform in this state, but this is not it.” One of his chief concerns with the bill was its enormous cost and the fact that like its counterpart in Washington, D.C., it’s lean on details about its actual implementation. If only Correa’s peers shared his concern.
Washington Democrats should take note of California’s healthcare problems and the attempt to create a government-run system to try and save the state’s healthcare woes. As the Wall Street Journal adeptly pointed out in an article earlier this week, insurance premium rate hikes are the direct result of government’s meddling in private insurance companies. The CEO of insurance company WellPoint was grilled in a Congressional committee hearing this week, lambasted for the company’s plan to raise insurance rates by almost 39% for some of California’s Anthem Blue Cross customers.
The Congressional interrogators should have looked to their Sacramento peers, not WellPoint, in seeking answers to the rate hikes. Year after year the state legislature passes onerous restrictions and mandatory coverage for more and more ailments. Private insurance companies cannot keep up with such mandatory coverage without passing costs on to their customers. SB 810’s plan to completely take over insuring all 37 million Californians would plunge the state into an economic hole from which it would never recover.
California has always been admired for its innovation, leadership and boundless opportunity. But lately, the state has garnered the reputation of the cautionary tale for every other state government. The state’s leaders continue to push their agenda on a citizenry already suffering from the reckless behavior of its leaders. California needs reform alright, but not in its healthcare system—in Sacramento.
Didn’t Zero say he got the message about jobs being #1? Apparently he needs another message in November.
They actually have the most dangerous part of this thing already. The government control of who does or does not get treatment is all in the "stimulus bill."
SET THEIR LOCAL AND DC LINES ON FIRE! Bambi doesn't keep his promises...so buyer beware.
Sen Scott Brown's number is 202-224-4543
Capitol Hill switchboard is 202-224-3121
Lots of local demwit phone numbers on this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2408217/posts
Rename, repackage, rewrite it a tad smaller, and sell another pig in a poke.
Tennessee has joined several other states in trying to pass a Health Care Freedom Act. NO COLAs for granny, retired Military or retired fed employees. BIG NEW fees for Tricare for Life retired over 65 Military's secondary health ins. (DOD bill already passed, delayed but goes into effect 2011 NEEDS TO BE REPEALED)
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/10/military_tricarefees_blocked_100709w/
New Dem mantra: Woof, woof eat dog food granny....ala let them eat cake.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Obama says slight fix will extend Social Security
http://townhall.com/news/us/2010/02/19/obama_says_slight_fix_will_extend_social_security
Health Care Rationing for Seniors Another Problem in New Obama Plan
http://www.lifenews.com/bio3058.html
TRI CARE FOR LIFE This from a google search:
http://economicspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/05/tricare-for-life-is-obama-trying-to.html
This option would help reduce the costs of TFL, as well as costs for Medicare, by introducing minimum out-of pocket requirements for beneficiaries. Under this option, TFL would not cover any of the first $525 of an enrollee’s cost-sharing liabilities for calendar year 2011 and would limit coverage to 50 percent of the next $4,725 in Medicare cost sharing that the beneficiary incurred. (Because all further cost sharing would be covered by TFL, enrollees could not pay more than $2,888 in cost sharing in that year.)
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9925/12-18-HealthOptions.pdf
http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/hcva09/hcva110609-1.htm
Bill Would Restrict Veterans’ Health Care Options 11/06/09
Buyer and McKeon Offer Amendments to Protect Veterans and TRICARE Beneficiaries
Congress plans to block Tricare fee increases
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/10/military_tricarefees_blocked_100709w
By Rick Maze - Staff writer, Oct 7, 2009
Tricare fee increases imposed last week by the Defense Department will be repealed by a provision of the compromise 2010 defense authorization bill unveiled Wednesday by House and Senate negotiators.
Snip
The fee increases were announced on Sept. 30 and took effect on Oct. 1, but the defense bill, HR 2647, includes a provision barring any fee increases until the start of fiscal 2011.
Snip
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Bill Matz, president of the National Association for Uniformed Services, said the announcement of fee increases was shocking considering that the Obama administration promised earlier this year to hold off on any new fee Tricare fee increases until fiscal 2011.
“President Obama and DoD assured NAUS and the entire military family earlier this year that there would rightly be no increases in any Tricare fees” in fiscal 2010, Matz said. “We took them at their word, and I can’t believe that a co-pay increase like this was allowed to go forward,” he added.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.