Posted on 02/25/2010 8:41:11 PM PST by upchuck
See how this works?
Line by Line attack on anything not budget related.
Gotta love Jim DeMint......Way to go....
Ill use every tool available to me in the Senate to stop it.
_________________________________________________________
That’s what I like to see!
DeMint 2012!
What tools exactly does he have?
Can't shake the comparison between the CIC and Chavez and wonder when his 'troops' will start their rampaging and locking-up of dissidents. There's a lot riding on Novermber midterms.
Bankrupting America and using HealthCare as a flank so people are too pre-occupied to see what the plan really is might be the transparency we were promised. Seeing through their sh*t is just too easy.
Chilihead's got a couple years to get a 'crisis' stirring that he can exploit. Then we'll see just how insincere that toothy smile of his is, as well as his Hootchie's depth of pride in America- which still happens to be under construction. Shovel ready, indeed.
Marker
Whose right is health care? Do you think it's yours?Congressman Anthony Weiner has said that health care is not a commodity. If it isn't a commodity then do doctors and nurses have rights? Assigning health care the status of a right makes health care workers slaves to that right who must serve it. On what ground could a health care worker refuse to provide their products and services since that would violate the patient's "basic human right to health care."
That is a direct loss of individual rights for health care providers. The collective right of the people to receive health care would supersede the provider's individual right to set fees and hours or to change their occupational status or even decide how to apply their skills and knowledge if taken to its logical extreme. A collective right, by practical definition, is a state right because it is a right that is created and given by the government to those it chooses to give it to. It is not a natural right possessed by each person protected by the Constitution from the government. It is also a collective/state right by virtue of the fact that it would supersede individual rights when the two come into conflict. How else would the government view a right that it created and administers vs. one it has no control over?
Of course it isn't stated in any bill that a patient's right to care supersedes a provider's right to set fees and hours etc, but it doesn't need to. Rights, as always, are adjudicated in the courts. The Health Care Reform bills simply establish the foundation for the courts to rule in favor of the collective right.
Weiners view is collectivist, fascist and totalitarian. Collectivist because it has to be described as being a right of the many instead of the one and superior due to that fact. Fascist because ultimately the sole authority for its creation and oversight is from one entity the Federal government. Totalitarian because the Federal government is the enforcer of this collective right as well. State and local jurisdictions will have little say about it.
Congressman Weiner's view is the underlying philosophy of all of the Health Care Reform legislation in the House and Senate. Consider this section in the Senate version of the bill; the setting up of community watch dogs that will monitor citizens for various health parameters. Read pages 382 - 393.
TITLE IQUALITY, AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL AMERICANS pps 382 - 393
So, even citizens themselves will be subject to Federal regulations on their behavior in order to fulfill the "human right" of universal health care. It isn't the individual's liberty that is being protected by that it is the government's control over its own health care system that is being guarded. How much clearer can it be that these bills abrogate the concept of individual rights? Someone will be checking your lifestyle, according to gov regulations, to be certain you serve the best interests of the "basic human right to health care" ie. "the Public Option."
HCR is not just about rationing care and wealth redistribution. It's about the end of individual rights as the corrosive effects of the new collectivist "basic human right to health care" spreads throughout the legal and political systems like a virus.
I think that the main purpose of Health Care Reform (HCR) is as a direct assault on individual liberties.
Health Care is a Liberty Issue
Conservative Underground - 18 August 2009 - Tim DunkinAnother Stupid Argument: Heath Care is a Right
Obama's Authoritarian, Unconstitutional Health Care Proposal
To Americans Who Believe Healthcare is a Right
OBAMA: HEALTH CARE DESTROYING FREE SPEECH
Mandated health insurance threatens freedom, privacy
Second Bill of Rights aka FDR's economic bill of rights
(An early attempt to embed collective rights into American politics and society.)
Ah, no comment on my addition?
Can't a poor boy get some sleep around here?
LOL. I guess you can’t if you’re trying to sleep next to your computer.
What’s with THAT?
You might want to bring that up with the lady of the house........
I was just innocently heading to bed (after debating insulting a couple of "both parties suck and are the same types"), when the red light flashed......
:-)
Goodnight.
I’m out of here too.
Well there are procedures in place in the Senate...I think the Fillibuster(of the HC Bill) is off the table...But to be sneaky like a Dem he could allude to the fact that the Next bill Dems try and pass thru the Senate will be help up by a Filibuster......
Possible lib talking point RE reconciliation alert: The Republicans passed welfare reform via reconciliation back in the Clinton years.
Don’t know if it’s true but I saw a lib post it in the comments of a WaPo blog article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.