Obama's "New" Health Care Idea

Health-care proposals from the White House follow a set pattern. The President identifies a real problem; he talks about the need for bipartisan action; he finally proposes a partisan solution that has been tried somewhere and failed miserably. Most of 2009, for example, was spent tackling the problem of “bending the curve” of health costs with the President ultimately championing a British-style government committee to guide Medicare treatment decisions. The British government is so taken with this idea that they are now distancing themselves from their own committee.

With Obamacare tanking in the polls, the President met with his advisors – and promptly stuck to his usual pattern. On Monday he suggested that rising insurance premiums are a problem and that bipartisan ideas are welcome. And then he touted the latest “new” idea: tough federal powers to review and reject insurance premium increases.

Superficially, it sounds like a potentially popular idea. There are three nagging problems. First, holding show-trials for the worst premium increases won’t limit health inflation for most Americans. Second, the plan is not as tough as advertised. And finally, the same approach has already failed at the state level.

Time and again, liberals have pinned the blame for health-care cost inflation on America’s for-profit care system. The explanation doesn’t hold up. If the problem is profit, then why are Medicare and Medicaid costs rising faster than private sector costs in 2009, according to the government’s own statistics? If the problem is profit, then why did Canadian public-sector health inflation rise almost as quickly as American private sector health inflation in 2009, even though Canada literally bans private insurance?

Yes, some Americans will face steep premium hikes this year. Their plight shouldn’t be ignored. But the President’s job is not to be the micromanager-in-chief. The President’s stated health reform goal in 2009 was to fight health inflation across the American economy. And America’s problem with health inflation is mostly seen in constant, routine increases of a few points over core inflation. While it might feel good to stomp on the worst increases, be sure that most rate hikes will slip through the new process unchallenged.

How can we be sure? Start with the fine print. Media reports make it sound as if President Obama will now be the supercop of health insurance. But the text of the President’s own proposal merely promises that “the state or the Secretary (of Health)” will review increases. A new Health Insurance Rate Authority will “provide needed oversight at the federal level and help states determine how rate review will be enforced and monitor insurance market behavior.” In other words, Washington will create a new, redundant bureaucracy to help the states to do what many of them do already.

This brings us to the third problem. Twenty-five states formally review health insurance premium increases. What happened to premiums in those states over the last decade? You already know the answer: they went up. Liberals insist this was because of a “lack of political will,” or the “lack of resources” - as if iron will or federal resources are needed to an unpopular premium increase.

The truth is more complicated. Take Massachusetts. The state has already implemented universal health reforms closely resembling ObamaCare. And, yes, state bureaucrats already review private sector rate increases. Yet premiums didn’t just rise since the 2006 reforms – they’ve risen much faster than average.

Two explanations stand out. First, rates rose because demand rose. Massachusetts now has universal coverage, so the insurance pool expanded substantially. And growing rates of preventable illness mean Massachusetts - like America - isn’t as healthy as it used to be. Also, new technologies increased basic costs.

Premiums also rose because lawmakers imposed dozens of insurance benefit mandates on Massachusetts consumers as a gift to provider lobbies. If the law says every consumer must buy gold-plated coverage, how can state officials say no to premium increases linked to those increased benefits?

ObamaCare already includes several federal benefit mandates, so the cycle will repeat itself nationally if the plan becomes law. Worse, the President is now appeasing Democratic senators with fifty state health exchanges instead of one national market. State benefit mandates will create cost pressure side-by-side with federal mandates, forcing federal bureaucrats to plow through overlapping regulatory systems to decide what’s fair and what isn’t.

Like so many features of the President’s plan, the tougher “new” rate review authority means more bureaucracy, more regulation, and more confusion, without much promise of better care, lower prices, or better access.

“Was Democrats’ Health Care Strategy Written In Federal Prison?
Rep. Schakowsky’s husband, Robert Creamer, used to be the leader of Citizen
Action/Illinois. He also founded its predecessor, Illinois Public Action, in which Ms.
Schakowsky served as Program Director. He runs a political consulting firm, the
Strategic Consulting Group, which lists ACORN and the SEIU among its clients and
which made $541,000 working for disgraced former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich.

“Creamer resigned from Citizen Action/Illinois after the FBI began investigating him for
bank fraud and tax evasion at Illinois Public Action. He was convicted in 2006 and
sentenced to five months in federal prison in Terre Haute, Indiana, plus eleven months of house arrest.
While in prison—or “forced sabbatical,” he called it—Creamer wrote a lengthy political
manual, Listen to Your Mother: Stand Up Straight! How Progressives Can Win (Seven
Locks Press, 2007). The book was endorsed by leading Democrats and their allies,
including SEIU boss Andy Stern—the most frequent visitor thus far to the Obama White
House—and chief Obama strategist David Axelrod, who noted that Creamer’s tome
“provides a blueprint for future victories.”

“CATO: OBAMACARE PRICE TAG IS 6 TRILLIONS
When we correct for both gimmicks, counting both on- and off-budget costs over the first 10 years of implementation, the total cost of ObamaCare reaches — I’m so sorry about this — $6.25 trillion.“

“The former CBO director, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, warns today on the effect ObamaCare
will have on our economy and health care. …This bill will lead to a huge middle class tax increase:
The bill creates a new health entitlement program that the Congressional Budget Office
(CBO) estimates will grow over the longer term at a rate of 8% annually, which is much
faster than the growth rate of the economy or tax revenues.“

”When Barack Obama ran for president, he promised that his health care plan would
"lower health-care costs by $2,500 for the typical family." Now, it turns out that new
legislation that he supports creating public-private "co-operatives" will increase the costs
of family health insurance by $4,000 by 2019.”

”Robert Reich Reveals Brutal Health Care Truths; MSM Snores
"We're going to have to, if you're very old, we're not going to give you all that
technology and all those drugs for the last couple of years of your life to keep you
maybe going for another couple of months. It's too expensive...so we're going to let
you die."

”PriceWaterhouseCoopers concluded that the cost of health insurance for the average
family will rise by $4,000 by 2019, as compared with doing nothing:”

“Customers will pay big for health fix: insurers”

“A major new report confirms the worst fears of many: Health care reform will raise the
costs for most Americans—by about 18% on average. That is on top of existing inflation of health coverage.”

“The WSJ Guide to ObamaCare. A comprehensive collection of our editorials. "

“45% Of Doctors Would Consider Quitting If Congress Passes Health Care Overhaul
Two of every three practicing physicians oppose the medical overhaul plan under
consideration in Washington, and hundreds of thousands would think about shutting
down their practices or retiring early if it were adopted, a new IBD/TIPP Poll has found.
The poll contradicts the claims of not only the White House, but also doctors' own lobby
— the powerful American Medical Association “

"Obama health care plan projected to cost 5.2 million jobs
In addition wages would be “stunted” for another 10.2 million wage earners."

"Oregon Offers Terminal Patients Doctor-Assisted Suicide Instead of Medical Care
PORTLAND, Ore. — Some terminally ill patients in Oregon who turned to their state for health care
were denied treatment and offered doctor-assisted suicide instead
"[How could they] not pay for medication that would help my life, and yet offer to pay to end my life?"

"Obama Health-Care Would Drive Up Inflation and Health-Care Costs
ObamaCare would shrink the economy, drive up health-care costs and inflation,
and increase the deficit,
Overall, total federal expenditures will be 5.6 percent higher than otherwise by 2019, adding $285.6 billion to the federal deficit in 2019”

"Pushing Veterans Toward the Grave”

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.