Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MEMRI: Editors of Arab Dailies Assess: A War between Iran and the West Is Imminent
IMRA ^ | February 22, 2010

Posted on 02/22/2010 3:47:20 PM PST by SJackson

MEMRI: Editors of Arab Dailies Assess: A War between Iran and the West Is Imminent

MEMRI Special Dispatch | No. 2818 | February 22, 2010

Iran/Islam and the West

Editors of Arab Dailies Assess: A War between Iran and the West Is Imminent

In recent articles, editors of Arab dailies assessed that a war between Iran and the West is imminent, and did not rule out the possibility that the Arabs would take part in it. The editor of the Al-Quds Al-Arabi daily, 'Abd Al-Bari 'Atwan, wrote that the war would change the face of the region, and the fate of Israel's occupation would be like that of the Nazi regime after World War II; the editor of the Egyptian daily Al-Gumhouriyya, Muhammad 'Ali Ibrahim, stated that Iran has already made the first move towards war; and Al-Sharq Al-Awsat editor Tariq Alhomayed stated that whatever happens - whether Iran acquires nuclear weapons or a war breaks out to prevent it from acquiring them - the Arabs will become victims of the Iranian regime.

Following are excerpts from the editorials:

Al-Quds Al-Arabi Editor: If Israel Attacks Iran, Syria Is Likely to Fire Tens of Thousands of Missiles at Israel, Some with Chemical and Biological Warheads 'Abd Al-Bari 'Atwan, editor of the London daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi, wrote in a February 13 editorial that if Israel attacks Iran, Syria is likely to respond with a brutal attack against it: "[Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad's declaration that his country is a 'nuclear nation'... and that it can enrich uranium to above 80%, exposes the real aim of Iran's nuclear program - that is, to produce nuclear warheads. In a phone conversation with Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, he demanded that Syria wage war against Israel and eliminate this country if it launches an attack in the region (on Iran). In my view, this is the most important development, particularly in light of the fact that [Ahmadinejad's] demand comes at a time of stepped-up preparations for war [by Israel]...

"I don't know how President Assad responded to the requests of his Iranian colleague and ally, but according to Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Al-Mu'allem, it appears that he felt that the explosion was imminent...

"There are two views regarding how Syria will respond if Israel attacks Iran, either by itself or together with the U.S. One [view is that] the Syrian government, in all its cleverness, will not lift a finger, preferring to take its time... The second is that Syria will join in the war and fire tens of thousands of missiles - including some with chemical and biological warheads - at Israeli cities and targets, under [its] current binding agreement [with Iran]...

"The second possibility is the more likely of the two. Perhaps the next war, if it breaks out... will change the face of the region from top to bottom, just as World War II did: Regimes will be wiped off the map, and others will take their place. Perhaps Israel will be impacted most of all, and it is not inconceivable that its fate [as an occupier] will be similar to that of the German Nazi regime...

"The current American administration is already preparing for the new war with a strangling blockade on Iran...

"[Most of] the pressure is now on China, so that it will not thwart a U.N. Security Council international resolution on a blockade [against Iran]. These pressures take the form of carrot and stick: The stick is the arming of Taiwan and economic threats; the carrot is demonstrated by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's visit to Qatar and Saudi Arabia, aimed at persuading them to sell gas and oil to China at low prices in order to compensate it for losses it is likely to incur as a result of sanctions on Iran...

"Some talk of a six-month timetable [for the war], which according to estimates, is the time that Iran needs to produce nuclear weapons."[1]

The U.S. Is Working to Line Up the Gulf States to Back Sanctions and a Military Move against Iran

In a February 15 editorial, Atwan wrote: "...Hillary Clinton visited the Arabian Gulf to focus efforts there prior to [asking] the U.N. Security Council for strangling economic sanctions on Iran... This means that American diplomacy is being implemented along with military preparations [against Iran]...

"Clinton's requests of her Gulf hosts can be boiled down to three points:"

"1) Making tempting offers to China of low[-cost] gas and oil ...

"2) Involving [the Gulf countries] in the blockade or economic sanctions on Iran...

"3) Opening bases, ports, and airports [of the Gulf states] to American, and perhaps [also] Israeli, planes, ships, and forces, in case of a military move against Iran...

"It is too early to estimate to what extent the Gulf States will comply with the American requests, [but I believe] they are likely to acquiesce, perhaps [even] without any argument at all..."[2]

Al-Gumhouriyya Editor: Iran Has Already Made the First Move towards War

Egyptian MP Muhammad 'Ali Ibrahim, editor of the Egyptian government daily Al-Gumhouriyya, wrote in his editorial that Iran has already made the first move towards war, but that only U.S. President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu know when it will actually break out and what it will entail. "One can envision the region as a chessboard with white and black pieces moving across it... The opening move was made by Iran when it announced that it was beginning to enrich uranium to 20%... As everyone knows, chess is a game played by two opponents, but in the Middle East, Iran is playing against a very formidable rival [consisting of] the U.S. and Israel, and with each passing day it acquires new opponents and loses more of its allies. Syria seems to be hesitating, [although] Ahmadinejad has urged it to join the war should Israel attack the resistance, [i.e.,] Hizbullah and Hamas...

"Iran is interested in this war, because it sees it as an opportunity to suppress its [domestic] opposition and accuse it of cooperating with the West. [It also hopes that] the shared sense of danger will prompt the Iranians to unite around their leadership. The U.S. is also interested in the war, because it will enable it to sell advanced weapons to the countries of the region, to impose its air defense umbrella on the Gulf states, and to determine oil prices independently of OPEC... "Tehran is forgetting that there will be no ground war against it... Cruise missiles and one-ton bombs will drop [from the sky] and carve [craters] seven stories deep... But will this paralyze Iran? Will not [Iran] attack the Gulf states and kill every American soldier in the region? And when will this scenario materialize? Nobody knows for sure... except Obama and Netanyahu..."[3]

Al-Sharq Al-Awsat Editor: The Arabs Are Victims of Iran

Al-Sharq Al-Awsat editor Tariq Alhomayed wrote that, to judge by the exchange of threats between the sides, a war between Iran and the West is indeed brewing, and that the Arabs are likely to become victims of the Iranian regime's moves. He wrote: "Every war starts with words, and what we are currently witnessing is a real war of words between Iran and the West. After threatening to close off the Strait of Hormuz, Iran found itself [trapped in] an ongoing and dangerous [spiral of] escalation vis-à-vis the U.S.... The day before yesterday, the White House said that no option could be ruled out in dealing with Iran's nuclear aspirations, including the military option...

"The most salient element in Iran's responses is Ahmadinejad's assessment that a war will break out in the spring or summer, and his threats that if Israel attacks, the resistance and the countries of the region will crush it. He has also threatened that if new sanctions are [imposed] on his country in response to its nuclear program, he will cause the superpowers to regret it. On the very same day... Hassan Nasrallah threatened to bomb [Israel's] airport [if this country attacked Lebanon's] airport... As I have often noted in the past, every time Israel threatens Iran, [Iran] threatens the Gulf countries, and every time Iran raises its voice [in a threat], Hassan Nasrallah repeats [it statements] like an echo. The notable thing is that Ahmadinejad threatens Israel and the West... not with his own country's weapons but in the name of 'the resistance and the countries in the region'...

"If a war breaks out, it will be an Iranian war, and Iran will be its target... Why [then] does [Iran threaten to] attack our region and our countries? This is not our war, nor are we working [to promote it] - this war belongs only to Iran and its proxies. As for us, we will be Iran's victims whether it acquires nuclear [weapons] and whether a war breaks out [against it]..."[4]

[1] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), February 13, 2010. [2] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), February 15, 2010. [3] Al-Gumhouriyya (Egypt), February 18, 2010. [4] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), February 18, 2010.

For assistance, please contact MEMRI at memri@memri.org.

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request. MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution. MEMRI P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837 Phone: (202) 955-9070 Fax: (202) 955-9077 www.memri.org


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/22/2010 3:47:21 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Grab your socks...


2 posted on 02/22/2010 3:49:51 PM PST by jessduntno (Bawney Fwank...with friends like him, who needs enemas?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Has Barry surrendered yet?


3 posted on 02/22/2010 3:50:59 PM PST by Skywarner (The U.S. Armed Forces... Producers of FREEDOM for over 200 years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Suddenly the conflict is the West vs Iran, not Islam.

4 posted on 02/22/2010 3:51:29 PM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywarner

“Has Barry surrendered yet?”

He hasn’t figured out which flag to run up yet...


5 posted on 02/22/2010 3:55:00 PM PST by jessduntno (Bawney Fwank...with friends like him, who needs enemas?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Agreed, and your tagline is hilarious by the way.


6 posted on 02/22/2010 3:59:01 PM PST by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Alamo-Girl; Amityschild; AngieGal; AnimalLover; Ann de IL; annieokie; aragorn; auggy; ...

A worthwhile read of Arab news about “imminent” WWIII

END TIMES PING LIST PING.


7 posted on 02/22/2010 4:13:44 PM PST by Quix ( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; FARS; paulycy; Oorang; onyx; JustPiper; MestaMachine

*ping*


8 posted on 02/22/2010 4:14:09 PM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I seem to recall somewhere in Daniel that there is a prediction of war that will turn some countries - including Syria - into glass. Meaning nuclear war wherein Israel nukes its enemies. Looks like we are moving that way.
9 posted on 02/22/2010 4:22:49 PM PST by majormaturity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

ping


10 posted on 02/22/2010 4:42:09 PM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Skywarner

The question here is, in a war with Iran on whose side will be Barrack Hussein Obama Soetoro?


11 posted on 02/22/2010 5:35:44 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Skywarner

with zer0’s approval in the gutter and his achievements nowhere to be seen, I could see him getting on board, only to rally support around him. He needs something big, Hes jimmy carter and knows it


12 posted on 02/22/2010 5:40:00 PM PST by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"In a phone conversation with Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, he demanded that Syria wage war against Israel and eliminate this country if it launches an attack in the region (on Iran)."

Ah, let's you and him fight.

13 posted on 02/22/2010 6:55:14 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If and when iran & Syria starts the war, watch how very quickly and heavily Israel stomps the crap outta them like a bunch of cockroaches they are!!


14 posted on 02/22/2010 7:06:34 PM PST by prophetic (0Bama = 1 illegal president = 32 illegal, unconstitutional & unnecessary CZARS to do his job!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Thanks for the ping!


15 posted on 02/22/2010 9:04:27 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

I think so too.

Though I suppose there could be an interim something before that eventuality.


16 posted on 02/22/2010 9:06:08 PM PST by Quix ( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Quix

Syria had better sit on it’s hands. Any chem/bio weapons land in Israel and Damascus evaporates.


17 posted on 02/23/2010 4:46:31 AM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

I think that’s highly likely . . . and fittingly so.


18 posted on 02/23/2010 4:50:46 AM PST by Quix ( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.” (Isaiah 17:1)


19 posted on 02/23/2010 6:44:52 AM PST by Outership (Looking for a line by line Book of Revelation Bible study? http://tiny.cc/rPSQc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Outership

Chronology of End Time Events

01) The war of Psalm 83. Damascus is destroyed. Israel gains territory
02) The United States becomes a lesser power. The United States falls into depression and social unrest
03) The rapture of the faithful
04) The first seal is opened....

See more at http://www.thepropheticyears.com/reasons/chronology.htm


20 posted on 02/23/2010 6:48:40 AM PST by Outership (Looking for a line by line Book of Revelation Bible study? http://tiny.cc/rPSQc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson