1 posted on
02/17/2010 3:21:57 PM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem; markomalley; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; Desdemona; ...
2 posted on
02/17/2010 3:33:32 PM PST by
steelyourfaith
(FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
To: neverdem
Nature, along with Science, has been thumping the tub for AGW for years. Now they're trying to keep the roof from falling in.
To: neverdem
Nature is a partner in crime with these scamsters, all they do is give a softball interview to one of these IPCC stooges.
They’ve already destroyed their credibility because of their alliance with this hoax, stay on that road to Damascus until you see the light.
4 posted on
02/17/2010 3:40:49 PM PST by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: neverdem
Here is the problem, its called incest:
“The authors are firstly chosen because of their experience and international stature. Secondly, they are appraised of the nature of the IPCC assessment, so the authors have a set of standards that they should follow.”
8 posted on
02/17/2010 4:10:07 PM PST by
Raycpa
To: neverdem
I fear it leads the public to a view that climate science may be less reliable than it really is That would be impossible. To appear less reliable that it really is, I mean.
10 posted on
02/17/2010 4:27:30 PM PST by
Rocky
(Obama's policy: A thousand points of lies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
