Posted on 02/13/2010 7:03:37 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
No, you’re wrong Martin.
It comes down to wisdom vs foolishness—understanding that there are external truths we can’t change with thoughts, or with language.
Palin understands this. You don’t.
Karl Marx didn’t. Machiavelli didn’t. The object of Alinsky’s book dedication didn’t.
You better straighten up.
Roland S. Martin is a CNN contributor and a talk show host for WVON/AM in Chicago.
That says it all, he’s a die hard LIBERAL TWIT.
Dennis Miller Press Secretary . . . now THAT would be fun!
Better to expend a Gallon of Sweat in training than a single drop of your soldiers blood in war for not training.
Roland who? =.=
She did all these things and her critics say, “she not smart enough.” So, all the people who hired her, voted for her, worked with her, did it because she wasn't’t smart enough! Her experiences of just being a woman and doing what she has done, makes her smart enough!
Some people think she is not smart enough ... they think that no woman is smart enough. Neither Obama nor Hillary Clinton can match her experiences.
No one in politics today can match her in the most important qualities that Jefferson said George Washington had. " He administered the government with fairness and integrity, assuring Americans that the President could exercise extensive executive authority without corruption. Further, he executed the laws with restraint, establishing precedents for broad-ranging presidential authority. His integrity was most pure”, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “his justice the most inflexible I have ever known, no motive of interest or consanguinity, friendship, or hatred, being able to bias his decision”.
And yes I think Sarah Palin has these same qualities that Jefferson said Washington had!
One thing I’ve noticed in every lib article slamming Palin, never once do these clowns bother to discuss issues. They’ll pick on some trivial thing and blow it up. In short, they’re afraid to discuss the real meaning of why Palin is so popular. My guess is that, the statists that they are, they want to keep the real issues from the public.
Obviously the man could never imagine, net even for a moment, that most of his rhetoric fits Obama to a T.
Right, which is why she was defeated when she ran for reelection.
"I yield to no man in sympathy for the gallant men under my command; but I am obliged to sweat them tonight, that I may save their blood tomorrow." -- Gen. Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson, 1862
And Roland S. Martin is just another loud-mouthed, racist, Black man. The dude is the Black version of David Duke.
F.R. is a PUBLIC DISCUSSION FORUM.
It is not a BACK PATTING SESSION.
Were we all to be of 'one' mind, and were we to only post articles that everyone agreed with, THIS WOULD BE THE MOST BORING WEBSITE ON THE PLANET.
However, what we have done for years is post articles with various points of view.
Then we all have a chance to either agree, or disagree with the author.
Articles like this, most of of enjoy RIPPING TO SHREDS.
DON'T TRY TO TAKE AWAY OUR JOY!
I thought Rowan & Martin were dead. Who knew he had a new gig as a jurinalist?
Thanks for posting the article.
My rebuttals....
Because they offered you a big check to write a negative article?
I see, but there is nothing wrong with Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, or any other Democrat doing the same thing.
“When it was reported that President Barack Obama’s chief of staff Rahm Emanuel told a bunch of liberals that they were “retards” for threatening to run ads against fellow Democrats who weren’t jumping on the health care reform bandwagon, Palin demanded his resignation.”
Rahm said they were ‘f***ing retards’. He holds a high position in the current administration. He should have a better vocabulary, and he represents the President of the U.S. DEMOCRATS demanded DAN QUAYLE be removed as Vice President for simply using the word POTATOE. Talk about being overly hypocritical!
True. Kinda ruins most of the ‘line’ of your discussion here.
Rush didn’t prefix the word ‘retard’ with a profanity such as ‘f****ing’, and he didn’t say it in anger, when he thought he was ‘off-mike’ and could get away with it.
“In an interview with Fox News’ Chris Wallace, Palin said Limbaugh was using satire, while Emanuel was blasting those who disagree with him. But anyone who can read or listen could understand that Limbaugh did the same thing as Emanuel.”
How can one understand the ‘liberal thinking (and current LAW)’ that one black person can call another ‘niggah’, but a white person doing so would be promptly arrested?????
If it ‘depends’ on ‘who’ says it, then why doesn’t that apply to Rush vs. Rahm?
Emanuel is a foul-mouthed, power-mad individual, and it wasn’t his display of disagreement, it was his display of ANGER that was apparent.
Again, this is PROJECTION to the Nth Degree.
“Sarah, if you were true to your cause, you would have demanded an on-air apology from Limbaugh and scolded him for using the word. Instead, you showed your true colors.”
Context is important. Is this why you haven’t put the context of Rush’s remarks in your article?
“I haven’t bought into the fake “I’m a real American” persona you are trying to portray, Sarah. You slam the president for using teleprompters, but write crib notes on your hand to remember basic beliefs that should be easy to regurgitate.”
No. She (we) slam the President for making it obvious that he is totally dependent on teleprompters. That when without them, he is an EPIC FAILURE.
The assertion that Sarah wrote those few words on her hand “to remember basic beliefs that should be easy to regurgitate” is again, total projection. Even if true, the fact that she used 4-5 words on her hand to make a FLAWLESS 45 MINUTE SPEECH should be considered a MIRACLE.
Most of us don’t consider FOX NEWS to be so much in the LAMESTREAM category. I guess you only consider FOX NEWS to be LAMESTREAM, but that says more about you than Sarah.
But it is OKAY for the other major LAMESTREAM media to have a studio built IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
“You give a speech riddled with falsehoods about the president and national security,”
FALSE, in what way?
OK. You jumped the shark. The second part of your sentence doesn’t even refer to the first.
“You don’t fool me, even as your legion of fans considers you the second coming of President Ronald Reagan.”
Doesn’t fool you, yet it is obvious IT SCARES THE HELL OUT OF YOU!
you know..I was up the other night wondering the same thing..typical lib thinking the world revolves around them..
Let me see, now...don't tell me...could it be...Hollowman?
Well...isn't that special!
Because he is either gay or is otherwise completely afraid and paranoid of smart pu$$y.
Some folks are simply misogynists.
Are you really calling me a homosexual or a sexist? Really?!
Or were you referring to Roland Martin?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.