Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
How did you conclude that?

"They were admitted, and only with the permission of a majority of the other states as expressed through a vote in both houses of Congress. Why shouldn't leaving require the same?"

358 posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:34:15 PM by Non-Sequitur

Rules regarding admission do not necessarily imply similar (if any) rules regarding departure. If you were right, anyone who entered the Publishers Clearing House Sweepstakes would need some kind of official permission to disassociate themselves with said program.

In other words, you're wrong - as usual...

;>)

477 posted on 02/09/2010 6:49:57 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies ]


To: Who is John Galt?
Rules regarding admission do not necessarily imply similar (if any) rules regarding departure.

"..do not necessarily..." Which means that it could imply it, right?

If you were right, anyone who entered the Publishers Clearing House Sweepstakes would need some kind of official permission to disassociate themselves with said program.

You don't find an analogy comparing the Constitution with a contest to be somewhat...idiotic? What are you joining when you send in your Publishers Clearing House entry?

In other words, you're wrong - as usual...

Because you say so? That always seems to be the only reason why anyone is wrong - because you say they are. Well, thanks for clearing that up for us.

493 posted on 02/09/2010 7:53:54 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson