Posted on 02/01/2010 5:14:28 AM PST by SJackson
I don’t ascribe to the violence of the Arab against homosexuals, but homosexuality is contrary to nature and I’m not “homophobic”, I’m just real. I’m not “afraid” of homosexuals or afraid of being homosexual, I’m realistic. Homosexuals are not depicted in the modern media for the lifestyle they really live. The “monogamous” gay man is for the most part a fiction.
Imperialist? Plot - yes! HIV/AIDS. Biggest scam in American history aside from Social Security Ponzi Scheme, and theDemonRats Great Society!
“queer is an example of cultural imperialism.”
Well, I don’t necessarily disagree. American culture spreads all over the world; if America is supportive of abortion on demand or the notion that being gay is normal and even positive, then those concepts will also be spread all over the world.
OTOH, if America considers that “gay” is primarily a psychological end result of abusive parents (particularly fathers); and that “gay” people are still “stuck” in childhood, looking for fatherly support, then that explanation will be spread all over the world.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
This differs from the Egyptian and Saudi press in that it's being taught in America, at prestiege institutions which have even trained Presidents.
Well I wonder who the ACLU is going to support in this one?
Sitting back to watch the fur fly.
For me, the more important question is this: if a professor who happens to be a Christian, said only 10% of what he was saying, would UCLA be quiet too?
Most Liberals have no balls when it comes to standing up against Muslims...I’m sure the homosexual community is no different!
Liberals think their appeasing will earn them points with radical Muslims. They don’t realize that they’ll be the first ones to have their heads sawed off! What useful idiots Libs are!
And yet, there is a saying among muslims:
“Women are for children; men are for pleasure.”
Take that however you want to.
Fixed it for you.
Pass the popcorn!
Christians, by definition, are the close-minded remnants of the once prevalent Christendom hegemony, renowned for its patriarchal and exclusivist idealogy. Ergo, any pronouncements they make on such a topic are by definition the products of that debased and archaic philosophy. In contrast, professors who are muslim are part of the great downtrodden, and any statements or beliefs they may put forward that seem to be "non-progressive", are in fact solely the products of the cultural isolation they have endured at the hands of the dominant Judaic-Christian culture.
In next weeks lesson I will show you how warmth is the same as cold, one is the same as two, and love is a form of hate. Double-plus understand?
I got three different kinds for Christmas, have a preference? :)
Columbia Ping.
This is one of the intellectual professors at Columbia nowadays.
Yes, they are! Binary Gender Normative (no one who is anyone says "homophobic" anymore!) Hegemonic. Patriarchal. Colonial. Hierarchical. Imperial. Eurocentric. Capitalistic darwinian. Oppressive. Phallo-dominant, even.
Comrade! Let us work and strive together with our leader Barack Hussein Obama, by making sure these retrogressive attitudes melt in the face of Global Warming and we save Mother Gaia from those who hold them.
Actually, Massad has a point about this. This is two wings of Cultural Marxism in conflict, the Gramsci-Marcusian sexual liberation school vs the Fannon-Focault “Wretched of the Earth” school. Let them kill each other.
I got a sweet tooth! :)
Thanks.
I forgot imperialist and colonialist and capitalist.
Got red, white, blue, and yellow, no sweet. :(
In that case, I’ll have a mix of “red, white and blue” for myself, and some yellow for the libs :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.