Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How a Crude Forgery Was Passed Off as Authentic to get an Unknown Elected as President of The USA
The Post & Email ^ | January 27, 2010 | John Charlton

Posted on 01/30/2010 9:02:29 PM PST by Red Steel

A Chronology of Forgery & Deceit

Most know that there are doubts about Obama’s Birth Certificate or eligibility to be President of the United States, but few are aware of how his supporters passed off an obvious forgery of a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth and used cleverly crafted quotes of apparent authorities to establish its authenticity for the purpose of committing election fraud upon the entire nation.

The notion that it is a forgery continues to be squashed by the Main Stream Media. Consider the transcript from Chris Matthews’s “Hardball” program from last night during his interview of J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ), who is challenging John McCain for the U.S. Senate seat in Arizona (note that Matthews is attempting to belittle McCain’s opponent):

Matthews asked Hayworth: “Are you as far right as the birthers?” Are you one of those who believes that the president should have to prove that he’s a citizen of the United States and not an illegal immigrant? Are you that far right?”

“Well, gosh, we all had to bring our birth certificates to show we were who we said we were and we were the age we said we were to play football in youth sports,” Hayworth responded matter-of-factly. “Shouldn’t we know exactly that anyone who wants to run for public office is a natural born citizen of the United States and is who they say they are?”

Matthews referred back to some of Hayworth’s past statements. “I’m reading your letter that says the president should go back and get his birth certificate from the governor of Hawaii,” said Matthews, who then added: “I’m just asking, do you stand by this letter?”

“Yeah, sure,” Hayworth responded.

“Should the governor of Hawaii produce evidence that the president is one of us,

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: article2section1; article3section1; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; certificate; certifigate; chrismatthews; citizen; citizenship; colb; eligibility; glennbeck; hayworth; impeachobama; ineligible; jdhayworth; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2010 9:02:29 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Sunday, June 27, 2004

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate


Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.

Barrack Obama

“It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race,” Ryan, 44, said in a statement. “What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play.”

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was “truly outrageous” that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

“I feel for him actually,” Obama told a Chicago TV station. “What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody.”

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

“Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state,” she said.

http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/http://eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm


2 posted on 01/30/2010 9:05:40 PM PST by Touch Not the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This is gonna embarass EVERYBODY-!


3 posted on 01/30/2010 9:06:32 PM PST by imjimbo (The constitution SHOULD be our "gun permit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imjimbo

But perhaps not the ‘everybody’ that you think.


4 posted on 01/30/2010 9:13:16 PM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant; ExTexasRedhead; Sparko; trlambsr; True Republican Patriot; 3IDVET; STARWISE; Lumper20; ...

Ping!


5 posted on 01/30/2010 9:23:59 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin: What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

One lemming is out of the hole!!!


6 posted on 01/30/2010 9:26:51 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Show it the cliff. ;^)


7 posted on 01/30/2010 9:29:05 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat

Nice catch!


8 posted on 01/30/2010 9:35:00 PM PST by scott7278 ("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked." BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
If as Comrade Obama Jr claims his dad was Barak Hussein Obama Sr, of Kenya,
than it's not possible for Junior to be a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S.

At the time of the drafting and ratification of the United States constitution,
the definition of natural born citizen, combined both the principles of jus soli and jus sanguinis.

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
Emmerich De Vattel, (1714-1767,) Law of Nations, 1758, § 212, "Of the citizens and naturals."

9 posted on 01/30/2010 9:39:52 PM PST by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

All Republican politicians, being interviewed, should carry their legitimate stamped birth certificate with them at all times. If asked the ridiculous question about being a “birther”, immediately pull it out of their wallet and say “If I’m not afraid to show mine why should the President of the United States be afraid to show his”?


10 posted on 01/30/2010 9:40:54 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
TITLE
11 posted on 01/30/2010 9:44:47 PM PST by Tawiskaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

OMG!!!

It's true...absolute proof!!!

12 posted on 01/30/2010 9:48:28 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Where are all those “anti-birther” clowns that are supposedly conservative or populist like loser O’reilly aka The Leprechaun. Clowns like Beck, Hewitt, Boortz (man is he tedious), Ingraham, Coulter (sad cause I like her), Medved and a few others.

True Blue conservatives and non-sell outs:
Rush, Levin, Cunningham, Savage, Malzberg, Dennis Miller (I think) and a few others I think including Hannity.


13 posted on 01/30/2010 9:51:03 PM PST by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImaTexan

ping


14 posted on 01/30/2010 10:00:55 PM PST by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

However Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Barack Hussein Obama Jr. as the 44th President of the United States and the state of Hawaii has verified his birth documents.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”

Furthermore in a lawsuit challenging Obama’s (and McCain’s) eligibility as Natural Born Citizens, the Indiana state Court of Appeals recently ruled that Vattel has no relevance to Article 2 Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution and that both McCain and Obama qualify as Natural Born Citizens for purposes of receiving valid electoral votes from the state of Indiana.
The lawsuit was Ankeny et. al. v Mitch Daniels, the Governor of Indiana. http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf


15 posted on 01/30/2010 10:02:14 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Emmerich de Vattel was the most popular of all writers on the law of nations in America before, but especially after, the American Revolution.
Vattel's {The Law of Nations} arrived, shortly after its publication, in an America, which had already been greatly influenced by Leibniz.
No later than 1770, it was used as a textbook in colleges.
It was often quoted in speeches before judicial tribunals and legislatures, and used in formulating policy.
Following the Revolution, Vattel's influence grew.
Vattel was cited far more often than Grotius and Puffendorf, in court proceedings, from 1789 to 1820.

Among those citing Vattel in legal cases and government documents, were Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, James Wilson, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, and John Marshall.
John Adams, the future delegate to the Continental Congress, second President of the U.S., and father of President John Quincy Adams,
recorded in his Diary on Feb. 1, 1763, that after spending the day frivolously, instead of reading and thinking,
``The Idea of M. de Vattel indeed, scowling and frowning, haunted me.'' In 1765, Adams copied into his Diary three statements by Vattel, ``of great use to Judges,''
that laws should be interpreted according to the intent of the author, and every interpretation which leads to absurdity should be rejected.
In a letter to the Foreign Minister of Denmark, in 1779, Benjamin Franklin quoted Vattel, and ``his excellent Treatise entitled {Le Droit des Gens.}''
James Madison, as a member of the Continental Congress in 1780, drafted the instructions sent to John Jay,
for negotiating a treaty with Spain, which quotes at length from {The Law of Nations.}
Jay complained that this letter, which was probably read by the Spanish government, was not in code,
and ``Vattel's {Law of Nations,} which I found quoted in a letter from Congress, is prohibited here.''
Later, John Marshall, during his thirty-four years as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court,
quoted Vattel by far the most among all authors on the law of nations.

The Law of Nations} and The Declaration of Independence
Delegates to the First and Second Continental Congress, which produced the Declaration of Independence,
often consulted {The Law of Nations,} as a reference for their discussions.
One important reason why the delegates chose to meet in Carpenters Hall, was that the building also housed the Library Company of Philadelphia.

The librarian reported that Vattel was one of the main sources consulted by the delegates during the First Continental Congress,
which met from Sept. 5 to Oct. 26, 1774.
Charles W.F. Dumas, an ardent supporter of the American cause, printed an edition of {The Law of Nations} in 1774,
with his own notes illustrating how the book applied to the American situation.
In 1770, Dumas had met Franklin in Holland, and was one of Franklin's key collaborators in his European diplomacy.
He sent three copies to Franklin, instructing him to send one to Harvard University, and to put one in the Philadelphia library.
Franklin sent Dumas a letter, Dec. 9, 1775, thanking him for the gift.
Franklin stated, ``I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel.
It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations.
Accordingly, that copy which I kept, has been continually in the hands of the members of our congress, now sitting ...|.''

The study of {The Law of Nations} by the delegates to the Continental Congress, to answer questions ``of the circumstances of a rising state,''
is reflected in the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776.
The central ideas of that document are coherent with Vattel's arguments on the criteria of a people to overthrow a tyrannical sovereign.
The Declaration of Independence states that governments are instituted to fulfill the
``inalienable rights'' of ``life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,'' and can be changed if they fail to meet these obligations to the people.
Governments should not be changed for light and transient causes, but only after a long chain of abuses to the fundamental rights of the people,
with repeated requests for redress of grievances, which were refused.
Repeated appeals were made to our ``British Brethren,'' but since they
``have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity,'' we are prepared to face them either in war or in peace.
Therefore, we declare ourselves independent of the British Crown, with the full powers of a sovereign government,
``to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which Independent States may of right do.''

The inclusion of the central conception of {The Law of Nations,} Vattel's Leibnizian concept of happiness,
as one of the three inalienable rights, is a crucial statement of the Declaration's Leibnizian character.
The Declaration of Independence was prepared by a committee consisting of Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson,
John Adams, Robert Livingston, and Roger Sherman.
Jefferson was assigned by this committee to write the draft of the Declaration,
after John Adams turned down the task, because of his numerous other responsibilities

16 posted on 01/30/2010 10:10:30 PM PST by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Hawaii hasn’t verified squat


17 posted on 01/30/2010 10:11:14 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Hawaii hasn't verified squat

Correct, but if leftists repeat their lie often enough they'll start believing it themselves.

18 posted on 01/30/2010 10:17:12 PM PST by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Hawaii hasn’t verified squat


19 posted on 01/30/2010 10:37:53 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”

At the time of Obama's birth in 1961, parents could rather easily get a Hawaiian birth certificate for a baby who wasn't born in Hawaii.

20 posted on 01/31/2010 12:12:02 AM PST by Isabel C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson