To: Spktyr
At the very least, youre looking at something coming down at orbital velocity.
Thats the point, you don't need a relativistic projectile. I know there is no such thing as overkill, just a continuum between open fire and the need to reload. But at some point the additional cost to build the thing just isn't justified. You don't need the worlds largest dragline to dig a hole for a fence post.
Besides the higher the velocity the longer the rail-gun has to be. And the longer it is the harder it is to hide it. You would to a lot better with four or five hidden rail-guns than one giant relativistic weapon that can get taken out in a preemptive strike before it becomes operational.
95 posted on
01/27/2010 8:25:18 AM PST by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: GonzoGOP
Don’t need to hide it. Just call it an ‘economical vehicle launcher’ (which it is), claim that it is to be used to launch payloads of ore back to Earth orbit for recovery, or just build physically large capsules and size the railgun for that. Obama wouldn’t order a strike on that. :P
99 posted on
01/27/2010 8:35:29 AM PST by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson