Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hundreds greet Brown in Hyannis
Cape Cod Times ^ | January 17, 2009 | Aaron Gouviea

Posted on 01/17/2010 7:46:15 AM PST by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Zakeet
If Scott Brown has the youth of Massachusetts, which is the most liberal state, it sends a message that things need to change," Bausch said.

The young people aren't liking this hope and change thing too much. I guess graduating college with student loan debt, no jobs and the thought of being forced to purchase health insurance at high premiums to help pay for the uninsured isn't appealing to them.

61 posted on 01/17/2010 9:57:58 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

To your last statement, YES WE CAN!


62 posted on 01/17/2010 10:08:29 AM PST by Red in MA (ate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tenthirteen

That’s political suicide in Boston, is it not?


63 posted on 01/17/2010 10:17:02 AM PST by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

This is the bluest state in the union!
This is the start of a true revolution!


64 posted on 01/17/2010 10:21:49 AM PST by Ladycalif (Justice for Agent Rosas - Secure the Border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in MA

Is not Ted Kennedy’s seat. If it were Ted Kennedy’s seat it would be upside-down and underwater.


65 posted on 01/17/2010 11:17:20 AM PST by Ladycalif (Justice for Agent Rosas - Secure the Border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

He also cheated Brad Delp out of money who died broke.


66 posted on 01/17/2010 11:31:11 AM PST by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz

His good looks aren’t hurting him one bit. Personally, I think people do tend to vote for the better looking candidate. I could be wrong. I also think JFK was a good looking man, and that sure didn’t hurt him as far as winning elections.

Why send an ugly, pinch-faced candidate to DC who believes the opposite of what the voters want, when you can send a hottie like Scott, who does represent most of your views? Its a no-brainer.

Sorry, if I’m being superficial, but, I do tend to think that the better looking candidate and the taller one usually wins. Most all of our presidents have been tall. I think we only had one short guy and can’t remember who it was right now.


67 posted on 01/17/2010 12:10:42 PM PST by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; SE Mom

THRILLING!!!!!


68 posted on 01/17/2010 12:13:32 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Liz

LOL.

How many “you betcha” replies?


69 posted on 01/17/2010 12:15:13 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: livius
You nitwits need to get this through your thin skulls. Scott Brown is NOT going to be a vote to overturn RvW. It's not that GD important. What is important is the future of the Republic. Scott will be a reliable vote on 99% of Conservative issues. And just an FYI, he's in favor of parental notification.
70 posted on 01/17/2010 12:21:47 PM PST by HenpeckedCon (According to the commander in chief, Allah Akbar means "live long and prosper!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HenpeckedCon
"Scott Brown is NOT going to be a vote to overturn RvW. It's not that GD important."

You're right; the ending of abortion is "not that important", it is critical to the fabric of the United States. Abortion must end, and hopefully Scott Brown is fully-on the pro-life/anti-abortion team. There is no such thing as being ok with a woman "choosing" to kill the innocent unborn, and there is no possible way to defend or justify such an action.

71 posted on 01/17/2010 12:34:27 PM PST by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus; Liz; 4integrity; Outlaw Woman
"I do tend to think that the better-looking and the taller candidate tends to win."

You're spot on. Research bears out what you say.

Said the NYT, "The surest way to predict the winner in a U.S. election is to bet on the taller."

Our tallest president was Abraham Lincoln at 6'4". He was followed by Lyndon Johnson who was 6'3 1/2". President Washington was 6'2 as was GHW Bush.

President Reagan was 6'1", JFK was an even 6 feet as is GWB. Jimmuh Cahtah is not too much a peanut at 5'9".

The shortest U.S. president was James Madison at 5'4".

Go, Scotty Brown, you tall, handsome drink of water, LOL.

Leni

72 posted on 01/17/2010 12:49:14 PM PST by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore"-10/20/09: "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

I am personally pro-life, but there are many issues much more important in this election. Scott Brown will be a consistent vote on the majority of conservative issues. RvW will only be overturned by the SCOTUS, not congress. Scott will vote to confirm conservative judges, that’s where he can help the most with RvW.


73 posted on 01/17/2010 1:50:30 PM PST by HenpeckedCon (According to the commander in chief, Allah Akbar means "live long and prosper!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
That's always been my position. Keep it legal, safe and really rare.

Just amazing how so-called conservatives start posting this kind of stuff on Free Republic whenever some new GOP Messiah of the "pro-choice" persuasion pops on the scene. Remember Rudy? (Oh, we don't have to remember, do we, since he has been out campaigning for Scott Brown?)

Good job if Brown can put another roadblock in Obama's path, but he is no more the Chosen One than the godless goofball we elected to lead the country. In fact, he's a lot like the kind of New England Republicans who get blasted as RINOs all the time here.

74 posted on 01/17/2010 2:04:41 PM PST by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HenpeckedCon

You need to learn some manners. Disagreeing with you does not make people “nitwits.”

Abortion is extremely important. In addition, it is just the tip of the life-issues iceberg; wait till Obamacare brings us euthanasia, including involuntary euthanasia of the mentally defective and the young, and the withdrawal of treatment or life support for the handicapped. Abortion is a tool of the state and part of the project of converting human beings with God-given rights into passive things that are valuable only as economic units of the state.

As I said, I sent money to Brown because the way that I look at it is that there will be more abortions with a Dem majority no matter what Brown’s opinion is, so we’re better off with him. And maybe it will be possible to change his mind or make him aware of the depth of the issue.

You should probably read and think a bit more about it yourself.


75 posted on 01/17/2010 2:15:29 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: livius
People who are not from Massachusetts commenting about Scott Brown being a RINO makes my blood boil, okay. Whether Scott Brown is elected or not will have no effect whatsoever on RvW being overturned in congress. It will not happen. If however we can get a solid conservative majority on the Supreme Court maybe it can be overturned. Scott Brown will not vote for Moonbats to be SCOTUS justices. So when idiots who don't know what they are talking about comment on how Scott Brown iv evil incarnate because he is personally for RvW, I become upset. I am personally pro-life, but this election is far to important to be hung up on an issue that will not change with this election.
76 posted on 01/17/2010 2:45:10 PM PST by HenpeckedCon (According to the commander in chief, Allah Akbar means "live long and prosper!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: livius
Did you ever try telling a Pro-Choicer that you too are Pro-Choice? As in Pro Choice for the baby?

If you would ask the child 20 years down the road if he would chose his abortion or his life, most likely he would chose life. So, yes I am definitely Pro-Choice.

I like confusing Pro-Abortionists that way. They just look at me quite stunned.

77 posted on 01/17/2010 4:27:30 PM PST by Chgogal (American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank, my car, my doctor's office & my elec. utility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HenpeckedCon
Moving from far far left to Scott Brown is an amazing turn of political fortune.

Tell them, “The Trend is Your Friend.”

78 posted on 01/17/2010 4:29:07 PM PST by Chgogal (American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank, my car, my doctor's office & my elec. utility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal; Catsrus; Liz; 4integrity
"Why send an ugly, pinch-faced candidate to DC who believes the opposite of what the voters want"

Personally I wouldn't give a damn if it were the Hunchback of Notre Dame if that person was in line with the Constitution of the United States. Sorry...this is where I depart...and really am saddened/disheartened that 'looks' mean more to some, than our very liberty. Apprarently, though...I am in minority status here (can I get benefits for that????/s). Personally, man or woman, I want an individual to stand up for right. That's my litmus test.......Not Looks.....

79 posted on 01/17/2010 6:56:15 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (If you remove the first Amendment, we'll be forced to move on to the next one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

I’m not saying that I believe looks are more important. But, sadly, a lot of Americans are very superficial. I was just making a point. Please don’t take yourself so seriously. I, too, vote for the person, not what they look like or how tall they are. My attempt at snark, apparently, didn’t click with you.


80 posted on 01/17/2010 7:31:06 PM PST by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson