Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Bottom has fallen out' of Coakley's polls; Dems prepare to explain defeat, protect Obama
The Washington Examiner ^ | 01/15/10 | Byron York

Posted on 01/16/2010 6:08:00 PM PST by pietraynor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: saganite
The Dems can’t explain this defeat (if it happpens). There’s simply no way to explain the loss of the liberal lion’s seat in the most liberal state in the Union. None.

You mean, without their denial bubble collapsing.

21 posted on 01/16/2010 6:44:51 PM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pietraynor
If this election goes as predicted, I think I'll send "my" Boxer, Feinstein and Pelosi little love notes:

============================================================
Re: Healthcare, Coakley and you...

You're next.

Regards,

nully
============================================================

Vote 'em ALL out
for a CHANGE


22 posted on 01/16/2010 6:49:51 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 360 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pietraynor
Here's what the DemonRATs are sending out to raise money...

I just got up to Martha Coakley's campaign HQ to help her win Tuesday's crucial special election. I have to tell you -- this isn't like anything Massachusetts has ever seen.

It's happening right after the holidays, so a lot of people haven't even heard about it. Meanwhile, the same guys behind the Swift Boat ads are taking over the airwaves to distort Martha's record, and the same far-right tea-party crowd that's attacking President Obama is funding her opponent.

The stakes in this race are incredibly high. If we don't hold this seat, a right-wing Republican will hold Sen. Ted Kennedy's old seat until at least 2012 -- and we'll lose a crucial vote in the Senate for health reform and the agenda we fought so hard for last year.

That's why we're going all out in Massachusetts with a massive effort to lock up a Democratic victory. But we can only afford to keep this battle up against the far right through Election Day if folks like you chip in.

Please donate $5 or more to help us make Martha Coakley the next senator from Massachusetts.

Democratic ads are highlighting the key differences between Martha, a long-time public servant and one of the nation's best attorneys general, and her extreme Republican opponent who would walk in lockstep with Mitch McConnell and national GOP power brokers.

And our organizers are engaging volunteers by the thousands to make sure Obama voters make it back to the polls.

But we need your help to keep it going. Please donate $5 or more to the Democratic Party to support our work, including our efforts to elect Martha Coakley:

Let's win this,

Hari

Hari Sevugan
Press Secretary
Democratic National Committee

23 posted on 01/16/2010 6:55:23 PM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

How about this explanation. Martha Coakley ran a horrendous campaign with many outrageous gaffes in the last days, and she came off caustic, bitchy, and mean. Even staunch liberals began to dislike her. Scott Brown on the other hand ran a brilliant campaign with no gaffes, and portrayed an image of a handsome “knight in shining armour” that caused many to overlook his conservatism and vote for the Knight who will save the day. That is why Brown won, it had nothing at all to do with national politics, and was certainly not a referendum against democrats in general or President Obama’s performance and his legislative agenda.


24 posted on 01/16/2010 6:59:36 PM PST by HerrBlucher (Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

That is the funniest post I have seen in some time.Revenge is best served cold.


25 posted on 01/16/2010 7:02:16 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pietraynor

"Let's polish this turd!"


26 posted on 01/16/2010 7:11:14 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imahawk

Just remember, if you have a democrat in your family slap the crap out of them.
When they ask why you did it, just tell them it is for all the stupidity that anyone who has ever voted for a democRAT has brought on this nation.


27 posted on 01/16/2010 7:12:13 PM PST by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
They will blame Coakley herself for all the last-week gaffes and errors....and then throw her under the bus.

I assume she will keep some space warm under there for the ultimate arrival of Sen. Benedict Nelson.

Leni

28 posted on 01/16/2010 7:13:47 PM PST by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore"-10/20/09: "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
"Let's polish this turd!"

ROFL!

Post of the night!

29 posted on 01/16/2010 7:18:14 PM PST by paulycy (The Liberals' DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE CRIMES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: saganite
There’s simply no way to explain the loss of the liberal lion’s seat in the most liberal state in the Union. None.

It's not hard to explain. True, there are more Democrats in than Republicans in Massachusetts. The more important fact is that there are more unenrolled voters in Massachusetts than the combined total of Democrats and Republicans. Brown is tapping into this crowd. It's a crowd that doesn't like what's happening now in D.C. They also don't like the way Bush and the republicans ran things. Brown has run a campaign mostly devoid of help from the national Republican Party. Brown had no appearances from Bush or Palin. He has had some lukewarm endorsements from McCain and Romney. Given Brown's apparently wise campaign strategy to avoid high profile Republicans and Coakley seen as a nasty hack, he's ahead. See the political demographics in the link below

Massachusetts Party Affiliation

30 posted on 01/16/2010 7:19:48 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie
The press will repeat Gibb's message, Obama is not running in Mass.

Actually, this is irrelevant. If Scott wins there'll be <60 Dem (or Dem caucusing indy) Senators suddenly looking at their and/or their Party's prospects over the next couple cycles.

And they're not going to give a rat's a** what Gibbs or the MSM are saying.
31 posted on 01/16/2010 7:31:38 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

LOL,Believe me I remind people constantly about how stupid they were to vote for a rabid marxist.Ya cant do nothin with stupid.


32 posted on 01/16/2010 8:35:18 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
Our only option would be to work OUTSIDE the normal ways of doing things.

Vote from the rooftops? I hope it never gets that bad, but if it is thrust upon us I say bring it.

33 posted on 01/16/2010 9:01:55 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pietraynor

The Independents have broken for Brown. Obama has gone too far for them.


34 posted on 01/16/2010 9:40:38 PM PST by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
If MA can elect a conservative Republican

He is only a conservative by Massachusetts standards. Still, under the circumstances he seems an excellent Republican candidate.

35 posted on 01/16/2010 11:00:55 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts; All

> The more important fact is that there are more unenrolled
> voters in Massachusetts than the combined total of
> Democrats and Republicans.

Do you think these are these folks who have sat out of
previous elections for Ted Kennedy, but now feel empowered
that he’s gone?


36 posted on 01/16/2010 11:13:10 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
I sent Brown a little more money today. My thoughts are; If by some miracle Brown were to win, I would like to be able to say that I played a small part in this historical event. If he loses, I can say at least I tried.
37 posted on 01/17/2010 1:52:50 AM PST by my right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson