 |
To be added or removed from the "The Wall Street Journal" Ping List, FReepmail GOP_Lady. |
To make up for the lost revenue—and to increase subsidies for lower earners to buy health insurance—negotiators are considering increasing the financial hit on drug makers, nursing homes and medical-device makers, according to people familiar with the discussions.
Thus hitting MA hard...Go with it Scott Brown.
Wait till the unions meet the death panels.
This sort of in-your-face pandering will backfire in a big way, just like it did for Ben Nelson in Nebraska.
Sounds like grounds for a lawsuit up to the SCOTUS. You base your income taxes on someone’s income. One cannot make exemptions for a certain class of people. Example if I earn 110 000 a year my tax rate should not be different from a union worker earning 110 000 a year, or a teacher, etc, etc (unless adjusted for standard and allowable exemptions that also is available to me if I qualify).
All unions? Just union employees?
Talk about raping the country!
I would rather see them ramp up the level of corruption in the “Health” bill, which is what they’re doing. I don’t think anyone other than a parasite can watch this and not be sickened. Obama and Pelosi may already have created enough anger to set a record for lost seats in Congress, and it looks like they’re trying for more.
do I really have to say it???