Skip to comments.
Obama’s Presidential Eligibility Scandal?
Australia.to News ^
| 12 January 2010
| Zach Jones
Posted on 01/12/2010 8:55:40 PM PST by circumbendibus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Folks down under are getting an earful here. The Canadian Free Press and British Newspapers are on to Obama, too. When will Fox News break this story?
To: circumbendibus
BTTT ... Bwahahahahahahaaha
2
posted on
01/12/2010 8:56:14 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: circumbendibus; rxsid; Red Steel; STARWISE; LucyT; pissant; Seizethecarp; patriot08; Danae
3
posted on
01/12/2010 8:58:16 PM PST
by
circumbendibus
(Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
To: circumbendibus
FINALLY!!!!!!! we are whimps, the AUSSIES are not!!! shame, shame, shame on America!!
4
posted on
01/12/2010 9:04:20 PM PST
by
bareford101
(Be loud! We have nothing – NOTHING - to apologize for in fighting for our Country!!)
To: circumbendibus
2. She attempts to mislead her readers with the bit about The Hawaiian health director and the state registrar of vital statistics then said they had verified Obamas original birth certificate. Most people will assume that HI verified whats shown on BHOs site. In fact, HI admits that theyve never done that:
http://24ahead.com/hawaii-has-not-authenticated-certifications-live-birth-shown 3. The two people who claim to have seen the cert were just staffers, not document experts. Also, FC later recompressed and removed the EXIF data from its pictures without noting that theyd changed them. 4. The problems with the announcements are gone into here:
http://24ahead.com/obama-birth-announcements
5
posted on
01/12/2010 9:05:22 PM PST
by
DontTreadOnMe2009
(So stop treading on me already!)
To: circumbendibus
If CNN were to break the story, they’d make FOX look bad, now wouldn’t they?
6
posted on
01/12/2010 9:05:55 PM PST
by
Mack Truck
(Obama's still hiding his background from the American people.)
To: circumbendibus
Well maybe people will wake up and start cancelling their TV service because your cable & sat TV bill sends $1 a month to CNN, $1 to MSNBC/NBC/CNBC and so forth.
Fox? Fox is 20% owned by the Saudis who put up a large chunk of the $700 million used to blanket all the media with Obama during the election. Roger Ailes is a good guy but Fox is bought and paid for. They are better than the others but don’t expect anything from them. General Electric aka NBC/MSNBC/CNBC are probably the worst followed by CNN.
7
posted on
01/12/2010 9:06:15 PM PST
by
Frantzie
(TV - sending Americans towards islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
To: circumbendibus
When will Fox News break this story?This will be a story unless a case moves forward and they are forced to "report" the facts. There will not be any investigative reporting, and you know as well as the rest of us, there is more than enough solid facts in more places that can and probably have been absorbed by many reporters....mums the word....Someone said "2008 was the year that journalism died"
8
posted on
01/12/2010 9:09:46 PM PST
by
GregNH
(Re-Elect "No Body")
To: circumbendibus
Of course he qualified. He be light-skinned and don’t speak no Negro dialeck.
To: freekitty; jesseam; ZULU; MamaDearest; NorwegianViking; Piquaboy; SouthTexas; unkus; flat; ...
Finally someone asking the right questions out loud that too many in this country are ignoring. Anyone know why considering what is at stake?
10
posted on
01/12/2010 9:13:17 PM PST
by
ExTexasRedhead
(Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
To: circumbendibus
I’d say it is far better than even money that the truth and this story blows up on Obama. The question is when?
To: circumbendibus
12
posted on
01/12/2010 9:17:30 PM PST
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: circumbendibus
“...I immediately recognized that this could be the biggest political scandal in U.S. history...”
.
This could be more than just a political scandal — this could turn out to be high treason on a large scale perpetrated by members of both parties and the MSM. Is there a statute of limitation for such a crime?
13
posted on
01/12/2010 9:22:02 PM PST
by
353FMG
(Save the Planet -- Eliminate Socialism)
To: ExTexasRedhead
McCain was neutered by his own off-shore birth, and constitutional lack of political spine.
Hillary!? I bet she and mohammed uh, hussein had a lovely conversation. She produced proof of his illegitimacy and threatened him with it.
He handed her the Hillary! dossier that soros prepared.
He'd only have to drop out of the race and claim he was always told he was born in Hawaii...
She'd be spending a long long long time in prison (possibly on death row?)
Guess who blinks?
14
posted on
01/12/2010 9:22:04 PM PST
by
null and void
(We are now in day 356 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: null and void
McCain was born on U. S. offshore territory to parents who both were U. S. citizens, ensuring his constitutional eligbility.
15
posted on
01/12/2010 9:26:41 PM PST
by
Elsiejay
(.)
To: circumbendibus
Bigger than Watergate Bawawhahahaha, snerk, hahahahah.
AS far as political scandal goes, that’s a minor puff.
Teapot dome - W G Harding
The Crédit Mobilier, the Whiskey Ring scandal Ulysses S. Grant
Bill CLinton and the Chinese (Take your pick with Billy)
“MIss Halpin” (Maria Crofts Halpin,) Grover Cleveland (More than Monica for sure)
Ya Watergate was big, but so were a whole host of others.
I’m sure, in time, Bammy will be found out for something or the other.
16
posted on
01/12/2010 9:26:43 PM PST
by
ASOC
(In case of attack, tune to 640 kilocycles or 1240 kilocycles on your AM dial.)
To: circumbendibus
The Republicans are and were stupid.
I have often wondered why Bill Clinton when impeached stayed in office. Were the gutless wonders bought off or threatened or what?
17
posted on
01/12/2010 9:27:12 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: circumbendibus
Of course Zack Jones is correct. Bobby Jindal could be a catalyst for some interesting legal battles, though I hope we don't reach that point. Obama, if he survives his first term, might face Jindal. From whom will the challenge to Jindal’s eligibility to come? There is no question that his parents were not citizens when he was born. The challenge to his eligibility will likely force a determination based upon original intent. If Jindal is declared ineligible, as he should be, then every bill, every appointment, every executive order by Obama is moot. That, in my opinion, is a blessing wrought by the genius of our founders. If Republicans are so corrupt as to offer another ineligible candidate they will, as they did with Obama, stay silent about eligibility. We need to watch them carefully and make it clear that their base will not tolerate continued corruption of our Constitution.
Every Republican senator signed Senate Resolution 511 in which “born of parents who are citizens” is the key argument, and place of nation of birth is barely mentioned; they were supporting the lie to the less informed that McCain was eligible. That the resolution (the third attempt by the Democratic Congress to insure that McCain, who received considerable Soros money, was their opponent) had no legal effect is irrelevant. It had the effect of calming the doubts of some who trust their representatives.
To: circumbendibus
Does the Schutzstaffel, err, Secret Service have any jurisdiction over our friends in Australia?
19
posted on
01/12/2010 9:30:23 PM PST
by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: freekitty
The Republicans are and were stupid. Yes. OTOH,The DNC are crooks or communists or both. They know exactly what they are doing. Pat Caddell, Carter's pollster, made these remarks recently on a panel with David Horowitz
20
posted on
01/12/2010 9:32:40 PM PST
by
circumbendibus
(Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson