Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2010 7:28:36 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sonofstrangelove
Nay, nay. Forward sweep is the future...


2 posted on 01/03/2010 7:37:02 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

Its the return of the Biplane!!


4 posted on 01/03/2010 7:39:09 PM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

NASA chose the Space Shuttle as the best means of getting into space.

NASA promotes Global Warming as our future climate.

It’s my guess that Braced Wings fall in the same catagory.


6 posted on 01/03/2010 7:53:54 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, islam will cover the earth with darkness for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

What’s next? Non retractable landing gear and propellers?


7 posted on 01/03/2010 7:57:05 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Veni, Vidi, Vicki: "I came, I saw, and I'm like, Omigod!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove
Just one of those shiny hooks that keeps drawing people's attention.

The concept is simple enough. A triangular structure is incredibly strong. Add another brace to make a triangular shape out of the wing, the fuselage, and this new structure. But wait, while this lets you build a lighter wing, now you have the drag of this new structure. Ahh, wait, put an airfoil on this new structure and it can produce lift as well. But wait, aircraft wings are incredibly strong through the concept of bend but don't break (Don't understand that comment? On your next airline flight, sit at the overwing exit and watch what happens to the wing during takeoff). OK, we'll tune the structure of the wing and the new surface until they both deflect the same amount under the same load. But wait, they're joined together so when they flex in one direction, one has to be longer than the other....

It goes on and on like this until only one conclusion can be reached. Aircraft are shaped they way they are because after a little more than a hundred years of refinement, that's the best shape there is. Until we can go outside of the atmosphere, aircraft aren't going to look a whole lot different than they do today. A few small tweaks, but nothing wholesale will change.

11 posted on 01/03/2010 8:37:28 PM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

15 posted on 01/03/2010 9:33:43 PM PST by smokingfrog (Don't mess with the mocking bird! - http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

Ok, I’m starting to get some ideas...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rutan_quickie_q2.jpg

Start with the above plane. But make the upper wing and the lower wing angle towards eachother until they meet about 10-15’ from centerline. Then from that point, a single wing extends another 10’ ish out.

So the upper wing will be foward swept to the joining point, and the lower wing will be rear swept to the joining point. The upper wing will have a negative dihedral, and the lower wing a positive dihedral.

Yeah, I think I’d like the way it would look. Not so sure about how it would work though.


17 posted on 01/03/2010 9:54:15 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Veni, Vidi, Vicki: "I came, I saw, and I'm like, Omigod!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

Jesus what did they do, detract money from important global warming research?


20 posted on 01/03/2010 10:04:07 PM PST by gura (R-MO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson