Well, if Jenkins can prove that she is the father, then Miller can give her visitation rights. Otherwise, I believe that child visitation sould be between father and mother only.
For artificial insemination, it should only be the mother. (Tough cookies, Jenkins).
What the hell is wrong with these judges?
The poor, poor child...everyone else involved has a room reserved in he!!.
Just another case of adults acting badly.
Homosexual, heterosexual, married, unmarried, whatever. They get together, pledge undying love, bring children into the union and then decide they can’t stand each other. Doesn’t much matter how the children came about biological, adopted, in vitro, natural, etc.
The adults are too self-centered to hold their disdain for each other inside and make the disintegration of what the child(ren) know as their family unit go easy for them.
Initial settlement seemed fair, custody to biological mother, liberal visitation with other parent. Bio mother was in contempt of settlement. I suppose court could have put her in jail, but chose to switch custodial parent so that the child still had a chance of having both parents in her life. The bio mother was wrong in both the legal and moral sense to deprive her ex-partner and daughter the ability to have a relationship.
Sorry, I’m with the judge on this one. The fact that it is a homosexual couple doesn’t matter.