There are Military Civil Engineers......
Posted on 12/29/2009 8:42:08 AM PST by 1rudeboy
>> Is this madness? If not, then what is is?
Your nick kinda spells it out, doesn’t it?
They don't really need that much competence to detonate a nuke successively, as a general detonation of the conventional explosive would still spread the radioactive material everywhere, and maybe even cause a dirty nuke detonation.
This says that engineers are more likely to be terrorists because they’re more often conservative, and everyone knows those conservatives are rigid, ideological radicals.
They conflate ANY strict religious observance with conservatism. That’s a bit annoying.
I dispute the theory that engineers are not risk-takers and tend to be conservative out of an excess of caution.
Engineers come in all flavors and political persuasions. What they do have in common is a background of scholastic discipline and the ability to analyze. Since it's obvious that Islam is using some of their engineers to attack us, perhaps it's time to use some of ours to tackle the problems of anticipating and thwarting the work of creeps who would blow airliners out of the sky.
Engineers are trained and probably preconditioned to focus on data that they can lay out on a table and work with - not the peripheral "noise" that other people might bring into consideration.
They also tend to over evaluate their own field of work and over simplify things outside of their realm. (I had a very respected associate once who ran for public office - couldn't fathom why people laughed at his campaign speeches because they were all so rational to him)
Conversely, today's engineering grads have been taught to trust computer programs written by others who are themselves programmers - it is often pointless to ask for confirmation of a finding because no one agrees on how the thing works and no one can do it on paper.
None of those attributes are "bad" but neither do they help in dealing with the less objective world; where it may be easiest to go for the absolutism that terrorists and socialism/fascism require.
“A morbid childhood fascination with explosives led to my engineering degree. :-)”
Should have tried organic chemistry. heh heh
Not so — they become politicians.
Quite true. I've had run-ins with a very liberal engineer where I work.
He and I debated AGW (this was before "Climategate") and I pointed out the fake, phony, fraud that is James Hansen. That sent him off the deep end.
I've always been amazed how someone with engineering training can think like that. He is a good engineer though.
Yes. However it was as construction engineers, building fortifications and buildings, not mechanical engineering.
When it was first started, I’m pretty sure *all* West Pointers received a military engineering education. It is the genesis for the term “Civil Engineer” - as opposed to a military engineer.
It is sometimes said the amateurs study tactics, while professionals study logistics. On that latter, it certainly helps if you can bridge and ford rivers, build fortifications, know how to take them down, etc. And an engineering education gives you some great tools for all that.
>> I’ve always been amazed how someone with engineering training can think like that. He is a good engineer though.
Indeed.
An Aggie, huh?
Because they didn’t have the charisma to be an undertaker?
There are Military Civil Engineers......
or community organizers
“When it was first started,” . . .
I know..... Think Robert E Lee, great military Engineer
Sounds like the infantile Objectivists from MIT who used to descend on my freshman dining hall spreading the gospel according to John Galt.
Engineering was the only degree.
Maybe it is because they use up the ones with liberal arts degrees in training.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.