Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mkjessup
Just because he throws charges against a Republican president he hates does not establish its validity.

And former Pres. Bush had very little to do with passage of socialized medicine. The same cannot be said of Sen. McCain who did his best to ensure the victory of the Arab kid, Barack Hussein Obama (I'm suspending my campaign to vote for the bailout).

McCain was the worst possible candidate to field against the young Marxist. Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter in vain tried to persuade Republicans not to have McCain as their candidate, but it appears they didn't listen to them. Perhaps they were brainwashed by the drive by media. Perhaps the author of the piece was brainwashed by the drive by media, too. He sure sounds like it in making former Pres. Bush the equivalent of Goldstein in George Orwell's "1984."

111 posted on 12/23/2009 3:25:52 AM PST by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Stepan12; mkjessup
And former Pres. Bush had very little to do with passage of socialized medicine.

Medicare Part D.

114 posted on 12/23/2009 5:15:13 AM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: Stepan12; rabscuttle385; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; All
Just because he throws charges against a Republican president he hates does not establish its validity.

I have noted numerous times that any individual who criticizes the actions of former President Bush is invariably accused of being a 'hater' by the legions of BushBots who are unable to tolerate any article, statement or position which is unflattering to the RINO from Texas.

And former Pres. Bush had very little to do with passage of socialized medicine.

Try again pal, GWB's massive expansion of Medicare Part D (Prescription Drug 'Benefit') was not only a giant step towards socialized medicine, it was a massive and irresponsible fiscal move as well, according to David Walker (former Comptroller General, GAO) who is on the record as stating that the bill in question increased the financial obligations of the Federal government by $8.1 trillion, which is even over and above the projected liability for future Social Security benefits of $5.2 trillion.

Socialized prescription benefits, fiscal irresponsibility.

In all aspects, George W. Bush spent money like a drunken sailor, even over and above the record spending set by LBJ as he attempted and failed to build his 'Great Society'. Bush expanded the role of the federal government at nearly every level, perhaps you or some other Bush devotee could point out an area, ANY area where GWB cut BACK the size and growth of the federal government?

I'm sure everyone would enjoy hearing about it.
115 posted on 12/23/2009 5:17:35 AM PST by mkjessup (The only GOOD RINO is .... wait a minute, there IS no such damn thing as a "good RINO" !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson