Posted on 12/11/2009 6:47:45 AM PST by rumrunner
Gawker reporting that environmental shill Revkin Quits NY Times
Moves Jolt Copenhagen
http://gawker.com/5420766/the-new-york-times-buyout-list Andy Revkin - Science Reporter/Dot Earth. (Described as "possible," not confirmed).
Who tossed him under the bus???
Just watch. He’ll end up A Nobama-appointed Czar of something...or at a cushy job in a lefty “nonprofit”.
There's a difference?
He’s going to work PR for the National Hockey League. You know, with his love of hockey sticks and all that....
Truth of the matter's probably the liar accepted Pinch boy's buyout.
A genuine win-win. LOL.
Yeah, really. They all work for the DNC now.
fyi
Can someone point me to the actual statement about Revkin. I can’t find it at the link.
The truth is too much for the liberal eco fascists LOL
So far, I can’t find anything on this story doing searches.
I heard a good one last night -
those who are pointing out the fraud of the global warming data
“just want to preserve the status quo”.
This kind of points out the mindset of the left - they HATE America the way it is, and want it destroyed completely in the hopes that it will be rebuilt more to their liking.
“Climate Change” is just a vehicle to get there.
I am a longtime CAGW skeptic. Andy Revkin is, as far as I can tell, openly pro-CAGW. It is true that he is in contact with the rathe runpleasant people at RealCLimate, UEA CRU, Sthe Sierra Club etc. But he is also in contact with CHristie, the Pielkes, Lindzen, etc. It is after all hos job. Mr Revkin is far more fair and balanced than many other environmental commentators in the MSM - Richard Black at the BBC, for example, is a national embarrassment. Andy Revkin, for example, was very open and friendly towards Steve McIntyre who debunked and continues to debunk the iconic IPCC Hockey Stick and related misrepresentations of climate science research findings. It is juvenile and uncivilized to berate someone simply because they different opinions to your own.
I personally wish Andy well if he is leaving the NYT. I fear his replacement at NYT may be far less amenable to reason and far less diligent in researching environmental issues.
This can’t be posted in news I don’t believe but it is good
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/10/counting-cru-tricks/#more-13415
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
