As a typical jackbooted, nature worshipping, green religious, socialist evo-journal...they deserve whatever’s coming to them...shut them down!
Yup, been fighting that fight full time for twelve long years.
"What you do, if you are a serious scientist operating according to the established method, is attempt to falsify your hypothesis. Test it to destruction; carry out serious attacks on its weakest points to see if they hold up. If they do... then you have a theory that can be published, and tested, and verified by other scientists. If you don't, you throw it out.
The "scientists" who perpetrated the "global warming" fraud approached their "science" in exactly the opposite manner as the approach described above. They formulated a theory and then did whatever they had to do with their data to "prove" it.
To have treason, there has to be an entity to be treasonous against. When the whole world seems to be made of warring factions and there is nobody acknowledged to desire the good of mankind as a whole, this is what honor breaks down to. Frankly, I am shocked. I thought that most scientists were higher minded than this. But when they discover that everybody coming down on one side of a debate makes them richer (at least lawyers as a whole don’t have this temptation) then the whole thing goes to pot.
Liberals are all too eager to tell you how the Nixon impeachment disillusioned them and scarred them for life.
I wonder how many people will be scarred for life when they learn that all the catastrophic global warming pap they were fed through school beginning in nursery school and lasting through graduate school was deliberately wrong.
This is a sad day for science. A good day, because it can’t be fixed until the problem is addressed, and it is finally becoming visible, but a bad day, still.
“I look at the corruption of science like treason.”
It’s worse than treason; it’s a forced march into the Dark Ages.
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
It's the same thing in textbooks. Why are all the textbooks liberal? Well, yes most of the profs who write them are libs, but even if you get a conservative textbook, the editors and copy editors and most of the publishers are libs. So it's VERY difficult to get a conservative book through the process.
Can any science type explain what "the three-body problem" is, precisely what the "problem" is, and what makes a solution impossible?
I'm not a science type myself and I never heard of this (no reason why I should have, I guess), so my question may well be badly phrased, and it may be a stupid question, but how will I learn if I don't ask questions? :)
ping
I attended a climate change-themed lecture at a VERY august institution a few months ago. One of the things the presenter noted was that the topic was perfect for every constituency in academia to use as a fund raiser.
In the Comments section, there are also some excellent remarks by a poster identifying himself as "Dr. Dave."
"I am convinced that there are genuine and valid levels of perception available with cannabis (and probably with other drugs) which are, through the defects of our society and our educational system, un-available to us without such drugs." -- Carl Sagan
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Treason is a capital crime and fitting.
The corruption is science is broad and deep and the origins are government funding of science.
Remove the money and you remove the need to lie-for-funding.