Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Wilding of Sarah Palin
The American Thinker ^ | 11-24-09 | Robin of Baerkley

Posted on 11/24/2009 3:10:21 PM PST by Slyfox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: cubreporter

Oh sure, it IS a great article. It’s just that we get these articles and discussions flowing and then someone post the same thing. Why not just bump the original. That’s the way we used to do it back in the day. :)


61 posted on 11/27/2009 9:07:59 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington
In the Age of Chivalry, gentlemen were required to come to the defense of ladies.

I would really like to see more of our side coming to Sarah's defense, especially the guys. Defending Sarah is really defending Motherhood and all the things the Republicans say they stand for.

62 posted on 11/27/2009 9:58:11 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I learned all I had to know about the so-called "women's movement" when I contrasted how they handled the sexual allegations made against Republican senator Bob Packwood and Democratic president Bill Clinton. In the former case, the Republican senator was run out of office, in the latter case, the women making the accusations were marginalized as "trailer-trash whores" and the Democratic president was not only given a free pass but given carte blanche to continue in his womanizing ways.

The women's movement is not about "women's rights" at all, but it is all about acquiring political power and they will cast any of their fellow women aside in order to obtain and retain it.

63 posted on 11/27/2009 10:08:13 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 29 days away from outliving Lefty Frizzell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
The women's movement is not about "women's rights" at all, but it is all about acquiring political power and they will cast any of their fellow women aside in order to obtain and retain it.

Bernard Nathanson, the abortion doctor-turned prolifer, was at the beginning of the abortion debate in 1973 and witnessed firsthand how the left allowed the women to take the lead, because the loud yapping those women provided were a great cover for the left to proceed in their leftward march. In other words, the left have always used women as a cover.

Men on the left love loud yapping women. They hate strong prolife women. They hate Sarah Palin and all women like her. For that reason conservative men should do the gentlemanly thing and stand up for Sarah. Only then will they secure their place as real men.

64 posted on 11/27/2009 10:52:41 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
Wow what a great article. It's got so many truths in it.

"My other epiphanies: those ponytailed guys were marching for abortion rights not because they cherished women's reproductive freedom, but to keep women available for free and easy sex."

" And the eagerness for women to make good money? If women work hard, leftist men don't have to. "

How accurate are these statements? I think most leftist men I know are EXACTLY like this.

65 posted on 11/27/2009 10:58:48 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Well, maybe that person didn’t know that?


66 posted on 11/27/2009 11:17:04 AM PST by cubreporter (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

I was motivated to look for this article because of the latest attack on Sarah Palin due to the feigned outrage at the pic being circulated of her small child standing on their large family dog.

I am grave-digging this post because now it is the only source of the complete article. It has been taken down from the original source.

This why it is important to post an article in its entirety here on Free Republic [if allowed] because they will otherwise be edited or lost altogether.


67 posted on 01/04/2015 10:59:25 AM PST by walford (https://www.facebook.com/wralford [feel free to friend me] @wralford on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford
Glad I could be of service. Yes, we should post entire articles when there is no provision against it.

Sometimes I go through my bookmarks and re-read old gems.

68 posted on 01/04/2015 1:42:59 PM PST by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson