1 posted on
11/03/2009 6:42:50 AM PST by
opentalk
To: opentalk
“Masked beneath the comfort language of the net neutrality bill are provisions that will effectively turn over management of the internet within the United States to the federal government via the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). It’s a power for which the FCC hungers. Perhaps it envies China.
So there’s nothing neutral about the Obama administration’s push for net neutrality. “Neutrality” is a D.C. comfort word for control.”
2 posted on
11/03/2009 6:45:12 AM PST by
opentalk
To: opentalk
Net Neutrality = Ted Turner can't block your access to FR.
Bottom line.
3 posted on
11/03/2009 6:53:02 AM PST by
steve-b
(Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
To: opentalk
Liberals hate it when an act truly does what it’s name implies- like “No Child Left Behind”
5 posted on
11/03/2009 7:03:44 AM PST by
Mr. K
(I live in fear that one of my typos becomes a freeper catchphrase...I'm series!)
To: opentalk; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
8 posted on
11/03/2009 7:04:24 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: opentalk
The current net neutrality debate existed before Obama came to national power. The concept itself has existed for about 150 years.
To: opentalk
Is anyone really surprised by this? This is no different than the communists taking over the conservation movement to push their controlling tendencies. They have now co-opted the "Net Neutrality" push so they can take control of the Internet. They are control freaks.
12 posted on
11/03/2009 7:23:53 AM PST by
Major Matt Mason
(The DemocRat Party is no longer an American political party.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson