Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b

There’s really no need to have aluminum bats. I understand they are more durable than wood bats, but they are more dangerous.


5 posted on 10/31/2009 10:57:01 PM PDT by Judges Gone Wild (Who is this uncircumcised, to oppose the armies of The Living God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Judges Gone Wild
I understand they are more durable than wood bats, but they are more dangerous.

They don't sound the same, but I never broke one (sharp ends and all that).

I don't see them as any more dangerous than a kid who can really wallop the ball.

The rest is up to the reaction time of the defensive players.

26 posted on 11/01/2009 12:08:00 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Judges Gone Wild

You might want to ask Steve Yeager about how safe wood bats are.

John Grisham has an interesting take on this controversy in his book “The Appeal”

I think the solution is composite bats carefully tested to match the performance of baseline wood bats. I agree aluminum bats are a bad idea.


42 posted on 11/01/2009 7:23:08 AM PST by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson