Posted on 10/31/2009 12:58:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Friend --
Remember all those socialist-hollering, Glenn Beck-worshiping, tea party wing nuts from this summer's town hall meetings? If Sarah Palin gets her way, one of them could soon be a member of Congress.
Next week marks one year since President Obama was elected. The amount of money we have in the bank will be used as an instant referendum on his first year.
With Sarah Palin out there raising hundreds of thousands of dollars to stack Congress with those tea party lunatics, the media is watching to see how Grassroots Democrats respond.
Help us raise $500,000 in response to Sarah Palin's fundraising for the tea party nut jobs. For every dollar you give before Midnight Tuesday, a group of Democrats will match it with $2 of their own, tripling your impact.
Tuesday night's deadline is a critical test of our muscle.
I've been getting calls all week from media pundits asking me if Palin's fundraising means that all those tea partying members of the right-wing fringe finally have the upper hand in their fight to bring back the George Bush days of disaster.
I need you to help us respond in the strongest possible terms.
Help us raise $500,000 in response to Sarah Palin's fundraising for the tea party nut jobs. For every dollar you give before Midnight Tuesday, a group of Democrats will match it with $2 of their own, tripling your impact.
Send a message to Sarah Palin and those tea party nutcases who think they can retake Congress. But we only have until Midnight Tuesday to act.
Thanks,
James Carville
P.S. Next week marks one year since President Obama was elected. The amount of money we have in the bank will be used as an instant referendum on his first year.
Excellent and AWESOME job! Glad to hear people are making a difference and NOT giving in, or giving up! Thanks for sharing the updates on this thread!
The monies can go to Owens. He can run ads and pay a few days later.
wingnuts'
lunatics;
nutjobs;
fringe;
nutcases.
Can someone, anyone, please explain to me how so-called intellectuals who have higher education degrees can be so dense about what works for humanity?
Point of fact, not ONE commune from the '60's still exists. Not ONE! Do you know why?
Because, like all communist entities, some in the commune didn't produce as much as others because they would still get there share of the produce. Those who did work hard for the commune became disenchanted because they were carrying the bigger load, while others just layed around doing their drugs or sucking up the production of those who were producing. There was NO incentive for the non-producers as long as they were taken care of.
I know all this for a fact. I had acquaintances back then that told me why they gave up on their Utopian communes. It wasn't because of the lice and other diseases that infiltrated their perfect little world. It was because they got tired of "carrying" all the no-loads.
I grew up on the streets of Los Angeles. I lived in cars and garages until I made my way with widget jobs, while never thinking those who had more were the enemy. Then, I joined the US Navy and made better of myself. Even then, I earned little money but was never envious of those who had more. I dreamed of being one of the bad "rich" guys.
What is wrong with people like Carvile's thinking? Are they really so engrossed with their "compassion" that they can't see how human character works? Don't bother to answer, I know the answer - they don't use their brains, they exist on "feelings". They believe socialism/communism can still work, if done differently. To them, ALL people should have the same outcome, not the same opportunity.
All people should be able to buy a house with no money down, free medical care, have (2) cars, a HDTV, a cell phone, a computer and access to the Internet, cable or satellite TV, and most importantly, a new fridge full of Colt 45. That is what we call "poor" in this country.
I'm simply amazed that these "intellectuals" haven't learned from history and have lowered the bar on what is considered poverty. Just look around the world for (5) minutes and you will see genuine poverty. I've been there and seen what "poor" is. Other than those who want to live on streets (which are the majority), there are NO poor in this Country.
Back on topic, tell me where I'm wrong. Carvile thinks those of us who appreciate self-worth and integrity are "nutcases".
wingnuts'
lunatics;
nutjobs;
fringe;
nutcases.
Can someone, anyone, please explain to me how so-called intellectuals who have higher education degrees can be so dense about what works for humanity?
Point of fact, not ONE commune from the '60's still exists. Not ONE! Do you know why?
Because, like all communist entities, some in the commune didn't produce as much as others because they would still get there share of the produce. Those who did work hard for the commune became disenchanted because they were carrying the bigger load, while others just layed around doing their drugs or sucking up the production of those who were producing. There was NO incentive for the non-producers as long as they were taken care of.
I know all this for a fact. I had acquaintances back then that told me why they gave up on their Utopian communes. It wasn't because of the lice and other diseases that infiltrated their perfect little world. It was because they got tired of "carrying" all the no-loads.
I grew up on the streets of Los Angeles. I lived in cars and garages until I made my way with widget jobs, while never thinking those who had more were the enemy. Then, I joined the US Navy and made better of myself. Even then, I earned little money but was never envious of those who had more. I dreamed of being one of the bad "rich" guys.
What is wrong with people like Carvile's thinking? Are they really so engrossed with their "compassion" that they can't see how human character works? Don't bother to answer, I know the answer - they don't use their brains, they exist on "feelings". They believe socialism/communism can still work, if done differently. To them, ALL people should have the same outcome, not the same opportunity.
All people should be able to buy a house with no money down, free medical care, have (2) cars, a HDTV, a cell phone, a computer and access to the Internet, cable or satellite TV, and most importantly, a new fridge full of Colt 45. That is what we call "poor" in this country.
I'm simply amazed that these "intellectuals" haven't learned from history and have lowered the bar on what is considered poverty. Just look around the world for (5) minutes and you will see genuine poverty. I've been there and seen what "poor" is. Other than those who want to live on streets (which are the majority), there are NO poor in this Country.
Back on topic, tell me where I'm wrong. Carvile thinks those of us who appreciate self-worth and integrity are "nutcases".
wingnuts'
lunatics;
nutjobs;
fringe;
nutcases.
Can someone, anyone, please explain to me how so-called intellectuals who have higher education degrees can be so dense about what works for humanity?
Point of fact, not ONE commune from the '60's still exists. Not ONE! Do you know why?
Because, like all communist entities, some in the commune didn't produce as much as others because they would still get there share of the produce. Those who did work hard for the commune became disenchanted because they were carrying the bigger load, while others just layed around doing their drugs or sucking up the production of those who were producing. There was NO incentive for the non-producers as long as they were taken care of.
I know all this for a fact. I had acquaintances back then that told me why they gave up on their Utopian communes. It wasn't because of the lice and other diseases that infiltrated their perfect little world. It was because they got tired of "carrying" all the no-loads.
I grew up on the streets of Los Angeles. I lived in cars and garages until I made my way with widget jobs, while never thinking those who had more were the enemy. Then, I joined the US Navy and made better of myself. Even then, I earned little money but was never envious of those who had more. I dreamed of being one of the bad "rich" guys.
What is wrong with people like Carvile's thinking? Are they really so engrossed with their "compassion" that they can't see how human character works? Don't bother to answer, I know the answer - they don't use their brains, they exist on "feelings". They believe socialism/communism can still work, if done differently. To them, ALL people should have the same outcome, not the same opportunity.
All people should be able to buy a house with no money down, free medical care, have (2) cars, a HDTV, a cell phone, a computer and access to the Internet, cable or satellite TV, and most importantly, a new fridge full of Colt 45. That is what we call "poor" in this country.
I'm simply amazed that these "intellectuals" haven't learned from history and have lowered the bar on what is considered poverty. Just look around the world for (5) minutes and you will see genuine poverty. I've been there and seen what "poor" is. Other than those who want to live on streets (which are the majority), there are NO poor in this Country.
Back on topic, tell me where I'm wrong. Carvile thinks those of us who appreciate self-worth and integrity are "nutcases".
Sorry for the repeated posts...not sure what happened. Think it had something to do with my Firewall.
The law is one thing; justice is another. The tide is turning. Justice is getting ready to prevail. Standby...
I do believe he just declared war upon us. Bring it on!
I believe the leaders name is Jim Thompson. I hear he's a real nutcase!!!
I’ll send two agarot, by Bank Leumi check.
Help our Special Interest Lobby stop these citizens and their uprising! Doesn’t sound very Marxist??
Pray for Americas Freedom
I honestly dont understand what prevents Mary Matalin from taking the superglue to this guys mouth”
I can think of other places to also place the super glue.
I am unable to find one single reason why Mary stays with James.
He gets nuttier every day.
Maybe she thinks James is the secret weapon for the Conservatives. He helps us raise even more money.
Thank you, Tea Party Express Patriots!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.