Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWingNilla

I don’t know that any percentages are known or given and there would be no need to take plants aboard the Ark if they could regenerate but other than the fresh olive leaf brought back by the dove I think the bible is silent on the matter of plants and the Ark.


354 posted on 10/26/2009 3:00:08 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: count-your-change

Well I think Noah would have had to have brought most of land vegetation onto the ark because they wouldnt survive being underwater for too long. There are many species of plant that will be too badly damaged after being submersed in H2O for extended period of time. Or maybe he just collected the seeds? That would have saved a lot of space.


355 posted on 10/26/2009 3:05:05 PM PDT by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson