Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
"Obviously you’re an evo groupie, because you falsely believe that it makes you look “educated” but your lack of scientific method betrays you as gullible, and ignorant. Science is not consensus; it requires hard facts that are completely missing from the evo compendium."

You would be more accurate if you used a bong and Ouija board to determine what I believe and what my education and science skills are. I am a devout Catholic who believes in Theistic Evolution. Educationally I have degrees in Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering and have been awarded more than 20 US and foreign patents.

We do not disagree with the premise that God created the universe and everything in it, we only disagree on the process He used. Because your approach is 100% faith based you are not interested in data and science so no amount of either will have any impact on your thought processes. Just to satisfy my curiosity, how did you get past heliocentrism?

327 posted on 10/26/2009 11:13:08 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]


To: Natural Law

No, my approach is really evidence based.

Btw, last time I checked, there was a vast gulf between chemistry, engineering, and science in general, and the fairy tale of “thiestic evolution.” - Its neither thiestic, nor in any way scientific. Science still requires evidence.

Your pretense that there are any data or samples in existance that support your construct betrays your false faith. Take off your blinders.


330 posted on 10/26/2009 11:25:31 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson