Stick around til the end, and I guarantee you’ll see the score much differently.
Obviously you’re an evo groupie, because you falsely believe that it makes you look “educated” but your lack of scientific method betrays you as gullible, and ignorant. Science is not consensus; it requires hard facts that are completely missing from the evo compendium.
If sketches and plaster sculpture are good enough for you; if a tooth can define the aspect of the pelvis; you’re good to go, but I’d never want to go there.
Like cats on a barbecue pit - they never stop dancing and squalling long enough to make a cogent point.
You would be more accurate if you used a bong and Ouija board to determine what I believe and what my education and science skills are. I am a devout Catholic who believes in Theistic Evolution. Educationally I have degrees in Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering and have been awarded more than 20 US and foreign patents.
We do not disagree with the premise that God created the universe and everything in it, we only disagree on the process He used. Because your approach is 100% faith based you are not interested in data and science so no amount of either will have any impact on your thought processes. Just to satisfy my curiosity, how did you get past heliocentrism?