owner of the Washington Times
True, I guess. Obviously, it is possible for even a harmful cult to get some things right. After all, they wouldn’t attract people if they didn’t actually do something that was attractive. (Like the Hare Krishnas occasionally serve some tasty curries to the public.)
Is that paper prospering, or on the “media deathwatch” with so many other newspapers?
Oh, please.
Daily I watch the glee of the death of the so-called “old media” on this site. They do not discern whether the media in question deserves to be killed or whether it has purpose.
It’s repugnant, but it happens here all the time.