Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xkaydet65
He can question ZObama in official correspondence anytime he wants.

Actually, he was reportedly directed not to issue a request for more troops. So I don't know if you are correct in that.

And he should question Obama. But it, IMO, does not matter who the POTUS is, a field or theater commander does not publicly question the orders he has been given.

What orders did he question? He was brought in to conduct a counterinsurgency and has been saying the same thing over and over again at his confirmation hearings and ever since. And his positions are entirely consistent with what Obama also said until he went wobbly a few weeks ago and we were left wondering what exactly our strategy is. But "orders"? What orders?

214 posted on 10/05/2009 10:46:11 AM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Stingray51
If McChrystal was directed NOT to issue a request for troops and either leaked the memo or alluded to it in his presentation in London then he violated an order of, I believe, SecDef.

A question we should ask ourselves is how we would have reacted if a General, say Anthony Zinni, had been in active service in Iraq and publicly criticized the surge as unworkable and ineffective. I think we'd have called for his resignation.

268 posted on 10/06/2009 11:39:00 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (atement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson