Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

English angry over photo of Brooke Shields (nude at 10 yrs old)
Houston Chronicle ^ | Sept. 30, 2009 | World Entertainment News Network

Posted on 09/30/2009 6:26:59 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob

Children's campaigners in the U.K. have blasted plans to display a naked photo of a ten-year-old Brooke Shields as part of an art exhibition.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
artwork that contains challenging imagery

New Butt Order (NBO) newspeak for we want our child porn!

1 posted on 09/30/2009 6:26:59 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob

If she was 13, I guess it would be OK then.


2 posted on 09/30/2009 6:30:01 AM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob

A bathtub shot is not exactly a pedophile shot. It’s more of an invasion of privacy for a minor and voyeurism. Using that photo as a draw is pretty sick stuff.


3 posted on 09/30/2009 6:30:19 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
The Liberals have mostly normalized homosexuality.

Child pornography is next. Roman Polanski was taking nude photos of a 13-year-old, then he drugged her and raped her. That's OK, according to the Left.
Naked 10-year-old girls? Well ... that's ... uh ... that's art.

It's everywhere -- the sexualization of children is a major effort by the Left.

Animals are queued up for a future effort. Watch for it.

4 posted on 09/30/2009 6:30:47 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob

Did she meet Roman Polanski back then?


5 posted on 09/30/2009 6:30:57 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
New Butt Order (NBO) newspeak for we want our child porn!

FWIW, the photo in question first appeared in Playboy, in a "feature" that included several nude girls, 10 and under. Ms. Sheilds' lovely mother was responsible for her being here.

6 posted on 09/30/2009 6:31:05 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
A bathtub shot is not exactly a pedophile shot. It’s more of an invasion of privacy for a minor and voyeurism. Using that photo as a draw is pretty sick stuff.

And what would your opinion be if the photo appeared in Playboy (which it did...) ?

7 posted on 09/30/2009 6:32:33 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tips up

13? It probably wasn’t nude-nude.


8 posted on 09/30/2009 6:33:17 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Touche’.


9 posted on 09/30/2009 6:34:23 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (I may not be John Galt or Jim Thompson, but I AM THE MOB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob

....what was her mother thinking to allow such a picture to be taken?


10 posted on 09/30/2009 6:35:07 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob

Hmmmmmmm....I seem to remember a story last week in which a couple had their children taken away because a Walmart employee turned them in for taking bath-time photos of their children.


11 posted on 09/30/2009 6:35:14 AM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS
....what was her mother thinking to allow such a picture to be taken?

Well, now ... there was money to be made, wasn't there?

12 posted on 09/30/2009 6:36:04 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I don’t think there is a lot I can do.


13 posted on 09/30/2009 6:37:13 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Didn´t Brooke Shields later in life become quite an advocate to stop this sort of thing...like later she realized how exploited she was...?


14 posted on 09/30/2009 6:38:19 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS
....what was her mother thinking to allow such a picture to be taken?

$$$

15 posted on 09/30/2009 6:40:03 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

Her Mother is a whore to the almighty dollar. Her morals were checked at the door a long time ago.


16 posted on 09/30/2009 6:41:19 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Hope....Change...Bullsh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I don’t think there is a lot I can do.

There's nothing you can do: the photo was published in Playboy over 30 years ago.

I've seen the photo in question. It is in fact, "a pedophile shot." Certainly far more than "an invasion of privacy for a minor and voyeurism."

17 posted on 09/30/2009 6:43:53 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; cardinal4

It’s been almost 30 years since I was in I had a source in the US who would send me boxes of BETAMAX tapes via the APO. We viewed them, then sent them off to other recipients in the area. One day, I got a box that had been opened by Saudi customs and witnessed by USAF APO personnel. One of the movies had been removed because it was considered pornographic. That movie? “The Blue Lagoon,” with Brooke Shields.


18 posted on 09/30/2009 6:50:56 AM PDT by Ax (All roads lead back to Concord Bridge....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

what was her mother thinking

$$$


19 posted on 09/30/2009 6:54:26 AM PDT by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

“....what was her mother thinking to allow such a picture to be taken?”

She was thinking, “It’s the money, Honey.”

;-(


20 posted on 09/30/2009 7:22:18 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson