Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ho-Hum, Another Feathered Dinosaur
CEH ^ | September 25, 2009

Posted on 09/27/2009 2:04:48 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
Just because people on my list occasionally swat flies does not mean I should therefore bring more flies for them to swat.

I don't believe you have any IDers on your list. I have never seen one here.

121 posted on 10/04/2009 2:24:34 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Libertarians and Conservatives agree on some main points,

But Creationists and IDers DISAGREE on the main points!

122 posted on 10/04/2009 2:25:53 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

I didn’t say I was in an engineering physics program, but that I took engineering physics classes. They were physics classes designed for engineering majors, that were heavily calculus-based, instead of the more simplified physics courses that were designed to satisfy the general science credit requirements for students of other majors.


123 posted on 10/04/2009 2:27:13 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Well, I guess it depends on what you consider the main points :)


124 posted on 10/04/2009 2:28:29 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
It might just be because the ID folks have associated certain characteristics, or lack thereof, with an Intelligent Designer and some, like myself, are no part of that movement.

The folks over at Discovery Ins. often make some good arguments but so saying is not at all the same as saying a person has signed on to any/all/part of positions they may take.
And it's for certain no one has a copyright on the term “intelligent design” so that they get to define how others use the term.

125 posted on 10/04/2009 2:30:32 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
I didn’t say I was in an engineering physics program, but that I took engineering physics classes. They were physics classes designed for engineering majors, that were heavily calculus-based, instead of the more simplified physics courses that were designed to satisfy the general science credit requirements for students of other majors.

Oh. Your school didn't have a physics department.

126 posted on 10/04/2009 2:33:37 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

What “main points”?


127 posted on 10/04/2009 2:34:24 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Well, I guess it depends on what you consider the main points :)

Yes. Like whether or not one believes in God. Whether or not one believes that man evolved over billions of years.

128 posted on 10/04/2009 2:34:38 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

==I don’t believe you have any IDers on your list.

How will I ever sleep at night.


129 posted on 10/04/2009 2:43:40 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; GodGunsGuts

I’m an OEC / ID proponent. I am not a YEC that believes in 6 literal days of creation or that the Earth is 6,000 years old. Of course I do believe in God as the Intelligent Designer. I have told GGG this in another thread. Not sure if I meet the standards of your ID “witch hunt” however.

Here’s where I do stand: I believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God who came in the flesh and died for our sins. That all men (and women) have sinned against God, and that without the acceptance of Christ’s sacrifice on our behalf that we are destined for eternal separation from God in the next life.

I believe that the Bible accurately describes the human condition, and it reveals things about nature (entropy, expanding universe, time having a beginning) that would have been impossible for Moses, David, and others to have figured out by themselves.

But I am not convinced that the Earth is only 6,000 years old. I also am not convinced that man has evolved from anything else. The theory of evolution seems to get more fragile as time goes on.

Ultimately, I am not sure why these threads attract so much hostility (GGG: though to be fair, some thread titles appear to be deliberately provocative :) ).

I am still of the opinion however that atheists — especially conservative atheists have a conscience that blares out to them, and their belief in morality, about limited government, and rights that are inalienable are concepts that require a belief in something greater than Humanity.


130 posted on 10/04/2009 2:44:11 PM PDT by rom (Israel got Saul before they got David. Where's our David?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: rom
I also am not convinced that man has evolved from anything else.

Then you cannot be an ID proponent.

131 posted on 10/04/2009 2:46:28 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

I don’t think being an ID’er means you don’t believe in God. They specifically don’t tackle that question in their arguments, leaving it possible for you to believe their designer could be God, an alien, or what have you.

The billions of years issue is a major difference with most creationists, though there are camps of creationists for which that would not be a conflict either.

Now, as for points of agreement, both sides believe that the complexity we see in life could not have (at least entirely) arisen by random chance combined with natural selection. Both sides agree that many of the assertions of evolutionists are based on false premises or bad science. I think most ID’ers also agree with creationists that common descent is an unproven assumption not supported by observation. I’m sure there are more similarities, but you get the idea.


132 posted on 10/04/2009 2:46:32 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
I don’t think being an ID’er means you don’t believe in God.

How can you believe in God and at the same time believe that God is not responsible for the evolution of man?

133 posted on 10/04/2009 2:47:42 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
The billions of years issue is a major difference with most creationists, though there are camps of creationists for which that would not be a conflict either.

It seems that the age of the earth IS a major issue. How can a OEC and YEC find common ground when the YEC denies the what the other believes?

134 posted on 10/04/2009 2:49:44 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

“It seems that the age of the earth IS a major issue. How can a OEC and YEC find common ground when the YEC denies the what the other believes?”

Well, the enemy of my enemy is my friend :)

Both OEC and YEC agree with each other on fundamental principles that unite us, which are much more important to us both than any of the little issues we may squabble about.


135 posted on 10/04/2009 2:58:13 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

“How can you believe in God and at the same time believe that God is not responsible for the evolution of man?”

Maybe you don’t believe that man has evolved in the manner that evolutionists portray? To me, this statement is like asking:

“How can you believe in God and at the same time believe that God is not responsible for leprechauns and unicorns?”


136 posted on 10/04/2009 3:00:39 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Both OEC and YEC agree with each other on fundamental principles that unite us, which are much more important to us both than any of the little issues we may squabble about.

I have seen several YEC'ers here condemn anyone that believes the earth to be older than that which the 'Bible states'.

137 posted on 10/04/2009 3:00:52 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Maybe you don’t believe that man has evolved in the manner that evolutionists portray?

Do you believe that man evolved over billions of years as the ID'ers portray?

138 posted on 10/04/2009 3:02:44 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Well, the enemy of my enemy is my friend :)

Oh. You are willing to compromise your faith to align with a group that denies your faith?

139 posted on 10/04/2009 3:04:28 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

“I have seen several YEC’ers here condemn anyone that believes the earth to be older than that which the ‘Bible states’.”

Sure, there are some people of any belief that are so vehemently certain of their particular view that they won’t accept any difference of opinion. However, I think that since most YEC and OEC folks are Christian, the majority of us try to keep in mind that we are united by fundamental beliefs that are much more important to us than how old we think the world is.


140 posted on 10/04/2009 3:05:29 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson