Yes!
Is President Obama one of those liberals?
That's an obvious YES.
It's just so egregiously awful. Terrible.
So far I havent seen Obama forward anything except job opportunity for his Communist friends.
I think this goes way beyond "liberals," although the poor fools were probably used by him and the radicals behind him to put him into power.
None of the things he is doing is an accident. He wants to collapse us. He seems himself as being on some kind of mission from the Third World. What American blacks don't realize is that while he is using them, he actually doesn't see himself as one of them, either. He sees himself as an avenger from Africa and Muslim Asia, the worst of the Third World, sullen, dysfunctional countries that blame all of their ills on the West and the US in particular.
He was shaped by the Third World wanna-be Marxism of Ayers and his circle at Columbia, who admired the Black Panthers as radicals but really wanted to get back to the roots of black radicalism and identify with the Frantz Fanon style of Third World revanchism and Soviet-dominated Marxism.
The Third World is too dysfunctional to make it on its own, but requires the resources of the US (which he is busy handing over to them) and the intellectual or administrative control of a Marxist-based dictatorship, which is what Russia is fast becoming again. Note that not only is he trying to destroy our own economy, he is trying very hard to hand over dominance to Russia, as we saw last week.
He has adopted the concept used by liberals for decades of ‘dumbing down’ the education system to appease the unteachable.
He is bringing our financial power down to the level of the rest of the world’s failing economies, the problem with that is the weaker we get, the weaker the rest of the world’s economies become.
This doesn’t bother obama, in the least, he just wants America to be brought to it’s knees and feel what it’s like to be poverty stricken, destitute with the ONLY hope for the masses is “The State’.
For those of us who were unfortunate enough to have seen the Star Wars Episode I, we were presented with the following scenario posed by Qui-Gon Jin when he introduced Anakin Skywalker to Yoda. Jin claimed that Anakin would bring "balance to the Force." At that time, there were hundreds of (presumably good) Jedi and only 2 of their enemies, the Sith. To me, "balance" would imply that either the ranks of the Sith swell to match those of the Jedi, or, all but 2 of the Jedi are killed. Both scenarios are "bad" from the Jedi perspective, but "good" if you want to achieve fairness.
Of course, had Yoda simply told Jin to get bent, instead of agreeing to let him train Anakin, we would have had a much better movie.
No! Just more dangerous.