Posted on 09/14/2009 5:24:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
Recently featured on Good Morning America, the Environmental Working Group identified a “dirty dozen” list for the most contaminated produce that includes: peaches, apples, bell peppers, celery, nectarines, strawberries, cherries, kale, lettuce, grapes, carrots, and pears. Eat fewer of these and you will live longer, they suggest.
The EWG’s suggestion is seriously wrongheaded. First, there is a considerable body of evidence showing that consuming relatively large amounts of fruits and vegetables has tremendous public health benefits. Second, there is scant evidence that the traces of pesticides found on these products poses any health problem whatsoever.
Researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health explain that eating lots of fruits and vegetables “can help you ward off heart disease and stroke, control blood pressure, prevent some types of cancer, avoid a painful intestinal ailment called diverticulitis, and guard against cataract and macular degeneration, two common causes of vision loss.” They suggest eating as many as possible—at least 9 servings or about 4.5 cups a day for the average person. According to Harvard, the average American only consumes about 3 servings a day, which means many people consume even less.
Peaches—the EWG’s number one villain—are recommended by medical professionals because are high in potassium, a great source of vitamins A and C, and also offer the cancer-fighting antioxidant beta carotene. Drs. David Bryne and Luis Cisneros at the Texas AgriLife at Texas A&M University are working to breed peaches and other stone fruits to further enhance the anti-oxidant value.
Cisneros notes: "Stone fruits are super fruits with plums as emerging stars." In fact, studies conducted by Cisneros and Bryne find anti-oxidants in plums are as high as those found in blueberries, which are usually touted as the number one source for these cancer-fighting chemicals. Peaches and nectarines also tested quite high in for anti-oxidant value. Cisneros and Bryne are developing a red-skinned peach that could prove even more beneficial.
Yet EWG advice would have consumers forgo the fruits that research and other cancer-fighting foods because of trace-level pesticides. Yet the data EWG used to make its case—residue sampling of produce conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture during 2000-2007—reveals the pesticide levels are negligible.
For example, about 98 percent of the thousands of samples USDA collected complied with EPA safety standards (called a tolerance). Those that did not comply only exceeded standards by inconsequential amounts—often less than one part per million.
Consider EWG’s number one villain—peaches. EWG warns consumers about the “dangers” posed by the simple fact that peaches contain traces of pesticide residues. EWG laments: “87 percent of a single sample had two or more pesticide residues” and “one sample had nine pesticides.” They note further that 53 pesticides were found on the samples of peaches tested. Yet the real question is whether the samples contain residues in amounts that matter to public health. The data strongly indicate that they do not.
USDA studies find that more than 98 percent of peaches tested (2000-2007) were in compliance with EPA’s extremely cautious standards. There were only 30 violations over 7-years and thousands of samples. In those cases, standards exceeded EPA limits by less than a part per million—with an average violation of 0.89 parts per million.
Such violations have no public health impact. EPA standards are set so that even a child could be exposed at levels thousands of times higher without ill effect. For example, research of University of Texas’s Prof. Frank Cross highlights a number of studies showing that the EPA’s risk estimates overstate pesticide exposure by as much as 99,000 to 463,000 times actual exposure. They are actually tens of thousands—maybe hundreds of thousands—times more stringent than necessary to protect public health. An occasional exceedance of one-part-per million makes no difference.
EWG also laments that a few chemicals get on the produce for which EPA has no tolerance. But these products are not applied to the produce for pest control. Most get on in tiny amounts, by accident, so low that they do not warrant EPA and USDA action or concern about public health.
In any case, washing produce has been shown to reduce pesticide residues significantly in many studies as noted on the Food and Drug Administration’s website. Of course washing is particularly important to remove dirt, fungi, bacteria and other risks created by Mother Nature.
But rather than offer constructive advice, activists would rather generate unwarranted fear. Yet the real peril lies in their advice.
Are they including any politicians in their “Dirty dozen”?
Remember the rule of broadcast news: If it doesn’t scare, it isn’t there.
EWG is a leftist front group.
Baloney. Common sense food handling and a normal/reasonably portioned diet consisting of the three food groups each day is all that is needed. (Nicotine, Caffeine, and Alcohol) (-;
Argh, we’re all gonna DIEYEEEEEEEEE....
When equipment was developed that could measure trace chemicals to one part per trillion, scare mongers started having orgasms whith this type of headline.
One part per trillion? A body wouldn’t notice that, much less react.
And stay away from fats, sugar, meats and dairy products.
Just eat.....uh.....air. (must be purchased with Gore carbon credits only to guarantee purity).
Hopefully, these nutball members of EWG are following their own advice and there’ll soon be no more of them to spout this nonsense. By their standards, there is simply nothing on the face of this earth safe to eat. All plants contain some form of natural pesticide.
Their obsession is a mental illness, more of a danger than any other eating disorder. At least anorexics only want to starve themselves.
Remember in the “bad old days” when a country had “democratic” in the title - you know it was a dictatorship?
Remember this and put on the “cynic” hat when hearing of groups with “environmental, science, public interest, justics, etc” in the title.
OMGosh!1!!1!!1!!!1 You forgot chocolate! Go stand in the corner for the rest of the thread.
The so-called “EWG” is another group of over-educated dolts who cannot find legitimate work to do. This “crusade” provide them with a comfortable living, raising money from people who believe every kook theory that they hear and read in and on the media.
The air quality in the USA has been improved geometrically for decades now, yet the Enviro-whackos still, from their comfortable offices still preach the scenario of doom and gloom.
In plain words, perceived problems can be converted to large amounts of CASH.
I just heard that over-exposure to sunlight can cause virulent skin cancers. The government must institute a program to dome over the nations’ cities to protect the citizenry. Send your donations to.......(right)
I notice they’re not mentioning the bacterially contaminated Mexican green onions that are making so many sick...
Wash your produce, eat it. Enjoy it. Don’t listen to alarmist “green weenie” behavior modification nazis. That is all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.