Posted on 09/09/2009 4:23:50 PM PDT by fretzer
Republican State Sen. Mark Amodei kicked off his campaign for the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Harry Reid today, telling reporters that hell run a positive campaign in the crowded primary, but that plenty of people in Nevada want to get rid of the incumbent.
When you look at where Nevada is right now, I think were at a financial crossroads. We do not need the status quo, said Amodei, who is from Carson City. The focus really needs to be on Nevada right now.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.lasvegascitylife.com ...
Ronald Reagan did it. (Note: I’m not supporting it.) But apparently you find it OK for someone who calls themselves a Christian, but not for a Christian.
This post of yours was very entertaining. You simply cannot answer a question without shattering your fragile phony Christian cultist microcosm. Please try again. Can a Christian support amnesty for illegal aliens?
Like I said, a Christian CAN do anything.
The issue is whether he ought to or not.
“C”
No, you said someone who calls themselves a Christian could, but thanks for the clarification.
Now, if a Christian supports said amnesty, would they still be a Christian in your eyes?
If that's true, then the scumbag can drop dead.
Back to our regularly scheduled programming....
Your laying the blame for abortions in this country at the feet of sirchtruth simply because he refuses to compromise his conservative values and think like you is reprehensible.
Are you really this scatterbrained, or is it just an act for my entertainment?
Just getting the thread back on track after your attempted hijack of it.
I believe that was your contribution.
Now, which is more reprehensible: compromising one’s principles or 1,000,000 abortions?
People compromising their values and electing RINO’s into office is what gave us those 1,000,000 abortions. It’s not an either/or situation.
Therefore, it is intellectually dishonest to claim that sirchtruth, who is clearly a staunch conservative, is responsible for the abortions under this administration because he wouldn’t compromise his values.
Blaming conservatives for this administration and abortions under it, is a liberal smear tactic intended to drive people away from what remains of the conservative element in the Republican Party.
Sorry, cultmom, but thanks for playing. While there may be a sliver of accuracy in your post, people who are more interested in knocking off GOP candidates who don’t pass a litmus test and doing so in such a way as to smear the entire party are responsible for putting certain odious democrats in office. Those democrats are much more supportive of abortion than the smeared republicans. The republicans who leveled the smears are responsible.
Ok seriously, I have no idea what you are talking about.
1 or 2 rino's? If you're going to do that, GTF outta my party!
Honestly, you need to become either an independant or libert. if you're not already because all you're doing is insuring democrats retain political power with this kind of thought.
A moderate/rino holds back conservative thought and causes an unneccessary struggle to insue. Again, if you want to vote for a person JUST BECAUSE they have an (R) by their name please leave my party, I don't want you around, and neither do other conservatives.
I’m sorry—I was presuming that you actually possessed a modicum of intelligence. You gave me three choices, chief, remember? I voted for 1 and 2!
It’s my party and my country. Don’t f**k it up by allowing democrats to get elected.
CINOs gave us Obama. Are you prepared to admit that?
Moderates and rino's are losers because they do not advance the consevative cause and in some cases hold it back worse than any liberal could!
We just gave congressional control back to the dems in 2006 who are in hard left mode. The reason for this is because moderates and rino's have basically no clear cut plans to advance the country except to agree with dems and diss conservatives. So you can KMA if you think I'm ever voting for another rino again just because he's running against a dem so he might squeak a win out and gain an inside track to try and destroy conservatives and conservatism.... IOW, FU!
Oh, I’m sorry for being so insensitive—you have a small penis. I won’t bother you any more.
LOL! Well, at least if you don't have any facts, I guess this was voted the next BIG comeback line!
No, just plumbing the same depths that you’ve already explored. Ping me when your ready to have a civil discussion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.