Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat; CottShop
Basic fact, he was denied tenure because his work wasn’t up to par.

Again, put your money where your mouth is. You are at a severe disadvantage since tenure was not involved and "Darwinians" contend that Sternberg did not have a job to lose.

710 posted on 09/06/2009 2:05:07 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
ou are at a severe disadvantage since tenure was not involved and "Darwinians" contend that Sternberg did not have a job to lose.

Two different guys from the movie. The one who didn't get tenure was Guillermo Gonzalez. His publication rate had sharply declined since joining ISU, he wasn't mentoring his grad students well enough to complete their programs, and he was bringing in relatively very little money in research grants. Someone with a record like that shouldn't get tenure.

Sternberg really didn't have a job. He was a research associate, someone not employed by the SI, but affiliated in order to do research. You get that position for a set period of time by being sponsored by an SI director. When the term's up, you leave, unless your sponsor renews your status.

712 posted on 09/06/2009 2:23:47 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson