[[The post you responded to was a response to another post that was about people allegedly losing their positions.]]
au contraire mon ami- My post was in response to the fella that insinuated the Stenberg couldn’t be trusted because he was ‘denied tenure’, and that steinberg apparently presented ‘lies’ in expelled (although the person making hte claim didn’t prove any lies were presented- they just accused without providing proof- once again- par for hrte course with antiChristians)
As you point out, what lies did Sternberg make? They(Darwinians) harp about "job" or some such thing being the lie. But the facts are explicit. NCSE, which has no attachment to or authority over the Smithsonian nor to the group which published the journal in which Sternberg allowed an article supporting ID, was intruding into the relationship between Sternberg and the Smithsonian. And that intrusion was solely due to Sternberg's allowing the publication of the article in question.
Smithsonian's and NCSE's actions are examples of suppression of free thought.
I’m pretty sure the post was referring to Guillermo Gonzalez, not Sternberg (considering Sternberg is not a professor and doesn’t work at a University, what “tenure” could he have been going for?)