Posted on 09/04/2009 4:15:09 AM PDT by Man50D
Mengele and Goebbel’s would have been made Czars by this group of ghouls.
prisoner6
There are stories from other countries where they take organs from live people.
We have got to get these loony tunes out of office...
Every time I read something like this from one of Obama’s chosen minions, I want to go buy another box of bullets.
DNC Death Panel: "You voted wrong and pray to God. Your family's healthcare is hereby terminated
and your family's, especially your childrens', internal organs will go to China and EBAY for sale, for us" "
On the scheme of things compared to the other czars, this guy seems normal.
To believe in this policy, you have to believe that you don’t really have full authority of your body by default. You are only GIVEN PERMISSION to your body if you opt to sign a form that deny doctors from taking your organs for other things.
Whats that phrase again? Get your laws off my body
Let’s start with Sunstein first?
The obligation to participate in biomedical research.
G. Owen Schaefer, Ezekiel J . Emanuel, Alan Wertheimer. JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association. July 1, 2009 v302 i1 p67(6).
Abstract:
The article discusses the need for biomedical research to be looked upon as an obligation, that is available to every individual, whether they want it or not. Individuals should participate in such research in order to help make the society and community a healthier and long lived community.
Record Number: A203590946
And here's a more descriptive abstract from the JAMA web site:
The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research
G. Owen Schaefer, BA; Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD; Alan Wertheimer, PhD
JAMA. 2009;302(1):67-72.
The current prevailing view is that participation in biomedical research is above and beyond the call of duty. While some commentators have offered reasons against this, we propose a novel public goods argument for an obligation to participate in biomedical research. Biomedical knowledge is a public good, available to any individual even if that individual does not contribute to it. Participation in research is a critical way to support an important public good. Consequently, all have a duty to participate. The current social norm is that individuals participate only if they have a good reason to do so. The public goods argument implies that individuals should participate unless they have a good reason not to. Such a shift would be of great aid to the progress of biomedical research, eventually making society significantly healthier and longer lived.
Just combine with this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/863306/posts
China introduces execution vans
The Australian ^ | 3-13-2003
bookmark
Is sunstein’s head an organ?
bttt
Well, we all are now property of the state anyways, more or less. This seems logical, in a way.
Life in the work release big camp. It aint easy.
Enjoy Labor Day for The People’s Glorious Republic!
Right, sure it did....which is why we have so many pacifists and socialists. Liberals are such idiots.
I would not want to be seriously injured and in a hospital where a senior union official or politician needed my organs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.