Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: La Enchiladita
Sheriff Joe has the quick, low cost answer:


4 posted on 09/02/2009 3:44:09 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: twister881

The Joe Arpaio tent city idea is spot on, and interestingly, it is legal by international standards. That is, some years ago, there was an effort to establish what “human rights” exist in dwellings. But the nations with large armies insisted that “military field conditions” do *not* represent any violation of human rights.

This means that the only thing possibly preventing the State of California from doing so are liberal federal and State judges, who think it is up to them to decide what prison health and welfare standards should be.

But if the SCOTUS makes a clear ruling on the subject, then California should immediately construct a dozen or more very large, rural tent cities for inmates. They are far cheaper than brick prisons, can be put up in just a week or two, and can be put far out in the desert, only constrained by availability of water, power, and food.


7 posted on 09/02/2009 3:51:41 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: twister881
I don't see how one branch (Judicial) can dictate to executive branch how to run prisons...Separation of powers seems to be forgotten by judges...they have even made tax policy in Kansas (I think thats the state where the court orders increase in taxes to build better schools in certain districts)....they are the tyrants, followed by legislatures and executives..
10 posted on 09/02/2009 4:16:37 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson