I don’t see where Diogenesis’s posts are “spam.” They are valid links that demonstrate Slick Willard’s positions and actions on a myriad of subjects. How is posting truth/factual information “spam” ? Aren’t you interested in the truth, Charles ?
Charles is not interested in truth.
He can change the issue to California, to create confusion.
And then he complains about fonts, for the same reasons.
Then he refuses to address the real issue:
Romney’s exposed exercise of illegal legislative authority.
Actually, there were many. Many caught. Most not.
They are “spam” in the sense that they are often pre-canned repeated posts which also often are only perepherally related to the specific subject matter.
A link page which could be referenced by a single line in a post would serve the same purpose. Of course, we have an entire “truth file” available on this matter at the top of every page.
So for purposes of this discussion, his posts are spam in the sense that I’ve seen them already, I’ve read them before, and feel no obligation to look at the same stuff I already tried to discuss with him years ago to no avail.
I am intimately familiar with the arguments made by the stuff posted again and again, and would be much more interested in the opinion and reasoning of the freeper rather than seeing the same old links again.
Others here may well rather see links to what other people believe, than have freepers explain and argue their own points. SO it’s a matter of personal taste, I guess.
On an unrelated matter, because I don’t think it was clear through my snarking earlier, I did figure out what you meant by the “bold” posting, and I do sincerely apologize for not understanding your first response to me on the matter.