Your premise is false, and therefore your question cannot be answered, and is not a direct question. However, I did respond previously, explaining why I found your premise false, which would be an answer to this question.
TO answer the implied question, I am not ignoring the evidence, I am weighing what is presented and judging it, and I have not found it compelling.
I will note that while your question seems to imply that I have some other motive, it certainly wasn't a direct question as to whether I worked for Romney, and your later implication that I had been directly asked that would not be supported by this question.
The premise would be false were it a false premise, but because it is not, it isn't. You have, so far, only conceded his Socialist agenda with respect to health care. Do you consider someone pushing a Socialist agenda to be compatible with the Conservative Republican agenda ? Can such a person be called a Conservative Republican when they continue to champion such a policy ?
"TO answer the implied question, I am not ignoring the evidence, I am weighing what is presented and judging it, and I have not found it compelling."
In your opinion. But we discussed opinion vs. facts. You're entitled to the former, you are not entitled to rewrite the latter.