Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tet68

My other point was made in my original post.

DavidFarrar with his “mortgage crisis” comment takes the position that “greedy lenders forced unwilling buyers to sign for loans they couldn’t afford.”

Again, in order for a profit to be made, there has to be a willing buyer.

Too many people refuse to admit the buyer is ultimately responsible for the decision to buy the house they couldn’t afford.

If people don’t sign up for risky loans, there is no mortgage crisis.


45 posted on 08/23/2009 11:01:21 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: stylin_geek

No, not at all.

But what happened was, the banking regulations were relaxed, allowing banks to give loans to people who were not financially qualified, because A, they knew the government would bail them out, and B, as a consequence, they were now free to make money without risk.

So let me ask you, who shares the major responsibility here for the banks overextending themselves, the banks,their clients, or Congress?

Don’t forget now, it was Bush who supported the first TARP over us fiscal conservatives’ objection.

ex animo
davidfarrar


48 posted on 08/23/2009 11:39:40 AM PDT by DavidFarrar (davidfarrar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson