Isn’t it interesting that the folds on the docs in these pics are considerably different than the Taitz doc, and that the paper portrayed is nice and crisp and NEW.
“Isn’t it interesting that the folds on the docs in these pics are considerably different than the Taitz doc, and that the paper portrayed is nice and crisp and NEW.”
I usually lurk but I had to join in this conversation. The longer we talk about this the more the DUmmies are making fools of us!
The forger didn’t take the time to type it out, but it is obvious that the stain and extra folds were added in as the second step (the stain to cover up the typo of the word Maiden http://www.upload.mn/view/2vu1mtqgb7obp3yym18l.jpg). He shows us the typewriter. He shows the paper. What more proof do we need before we accept that it was a prank?
0 has comitted enough real crimes without us having to go around chasing birth certificates. Please guys lets focus on those things!
