[TennesseeGirl]

The Democrat's strategy.

[ckilmer]

I have seen these talking points brought up and taken down piecemeal on various threads. Can anyone put together the points and their rebuttals.

[y6162]

“The Democrat’s strategy. “

More like a KGB disinformation campaign. Stir up mud, cloud the waters.

[agere_contra]

As has been eloquently stated on several long threads, the only way to check the validity of this B/C is to compare it against valid B/Cs of the time.

We simply can’t say that they wouldn’t have done this or they wouldn’t have done that. They might well have worked on Saturdays - ‘in a heavily Muslim province’. They might well have called their province one thing or another on letterheads. We don’t know - the past is full of little surprises.

So - does the B/C match others of the period, and does it retail back to a registry entry? Those are the questions.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

Why would a predominantly Muslim nation actually say "Christian name"

Good lord, these people are stupid. Kenya is 80% Christian, 10% Muslim, 10% other. That's today. In 1961, when it was under British (Christian) rule, it was even less.

And "Christian name" was a very common way of saying "first name" at that time.

I can't believe we allow these idiots to vote.

[dangus]

Listing Mombasa as a birth place in Kenya does seem to negate the authenticity of the birth certificate. But, for the record, Kenya is NOT a predominantly Muslim nation. Kenya is 82% Christian, (10% traditional East African and nearly all of its English-speaking population would have identified as Christian in 1962. “Christian name” is what they probably would have put.

[TomOnTheRun]

I can’t help but think that Mrs. Taitz would better serve the world by going back to full-time dentistry. Plenty of people need pain relief there. She’s just causing anguish in politics.

[sourcery]

The document is dated 5 August 1964 -- a Saturday.

1964-08-05 is a Wednesday.

[woofie]

The document is dated 5 August 1964 -- a Saturday.

5 August 1964 was a Wednesday.

http://scphillips.com/cgi-bin/day.cgi

[Dryman]

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

[katana]

Mombasa was, in 1961, still under British rule and while officially considered part of Tanzania (Tanganyika, actually - also under British rule at the time) it was part of the "British Coastal Protectorate". Kenya did not become a republic until 1963.

In other words, the document is in fact , at least on this point, internally consistent since it was issued well after Kenya became a republic with the Coastal Province as part of the country. If Hussein was born in Mombasa on August 4, 1961 the original BC would have been issued under British colonial rules. This later certified copy would have been issued in the Coastal Province of the Republic of Kenya.

It may be debunked in some other way but the Tanzania vs. Kenya point holds no water.

[savage woman]

Everyone don’t forget to look at yesterdays thread by
BP2: Kenyan Birth Certificate - 1964 Divorce Timeline
put that in the seach.
It had 12,135 views. I think BP2 explained all of this
very well. Makes sense to me....