Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport

Recently Texas utilties have had to back off plans to construct new coal fired plants. Almost all of the recent power plant construction has been natgas. Unfortunately I’m served by natgas generation and my bills show it.

Natgas is too valuable an energy source to be used for fixed plant generation. Coal on the other hand is ideally suited for fixed plant but can’t be used in nearly the other applications as natgas.

Per kwh I’m in the top 5% (most expensive) in cost nationwide.


74 posted on 07/08/2009 10:55:49 AM PDT by bereanway (Sarah get your gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: bereanway

Yes some were cancelled due to various reasons many of which are evior related or lawsuits. However some have been cleared to begin construction and some are under way.

Are you served by a gov’t/coop type utility or from a private sector utility?


79 posted on 07/08/2009 11:05:21 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: bereanway

Coal (actually lignite) is too expensive to strip mine because of the reclamation and the low BTU content. Much of the coal now comes down from the Rockies or plants have been switched to burn natural gas.


96 posted on 07/08/2009 11:30:17 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson