Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Entrepreneur

It would be interesting to know if the UK-banned treatments are approved by the FDA here in America. Banning a ‘treatment’ isn’t necessarily a bad thing if it is quack medicine. Not enough details to make any kind of judgment here as far as I’m concerned.


2 posted on 07/02/2009 9:08:52 AM PDT by theknuckler_33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: theknuckler_33
It would be interesting to know if the UK-banned treatments are approved by the FDA here in America. Banning a ‘treatment’ isn’t necessarily a bad thing if it is quack medicine. Not enough details to make any kind of judgment here as far as I’m concerned.

There's plenty of information. Read the article...

The rejected drugs - bevacizumab (Avastin), sorafenib (Nexavar) and temsirolimus (Torisel) - have similar costs and are used in other countries.

5 posted on 07/02/2009 9:20:52 AM PDT by Entrepreneur (The environmental movement is filled with watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: theknuckler_33

They don’t ban treatments because they’re quck but because they are expensive,

If medicine A is $120 and lets you live 6 months with some pain and treatment B is $500 and lets you live 8 months pain free

They’ll BAN treatment B, even if A won’t work for everyone

Its about cost


9 posted on 08/24/2009 4:34:39 PM PDT by GeronL (Toward the TOTUS State-Nightmare in Obamaland .. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson