Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

You might be right. I don’t know anything about the Republicans running for Governor in MA.

Rhode Island is different from Massachusetts in a few ways. It has a significantly lower percentage of the university and government crowd, not to mention professional political activists (including reporters)l and a larger portion of its populace is blue-collar.


25 posted on 07/02/2009 6:08:53 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued

{larger portion of its populace is blue-collar.}

Which means Rhode Island is Labor Union heavy. For a New England state, RI does have some pro-life sentiment. It has the most restrictive abortion laws in New England, where the rest of the region is an abortion doctor’s paradise.

The problem is the RI GOP is made up of secular minded WASPs. Think the Chafee family. They’re a dying breed. Pro-life sentiment is in the church going Catholics. The problem is they vote for the Labor Unions. As a result, a pro-life Republican is unacceptable to RI, while a pro-life Dem is.


26 posted on 07/02/2009 8:02:08 PM PDT by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson