Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema; Scythian; Pelham; 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; ...

Oxygen treatment key to swine flu survival

Tuesday, 13 October 2009
Nicky Phillips
ABC
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2009/10/13/2711206.htm

Doctors believe intensive care management saved many with swine flu patients in Australia

Swine flu deaths in Australia could have doubled without the use of a mechanical heart and lung treatment, says doctor.

A new Australian and New Zealand study, published in today’s edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association, found 79% of swine flu patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) survived.Intensive care specialist Dr Daryl Jones of Monash University in Melbourne, says ECMO is an artificial heart and lung machine.

It takes the blood out of the body, removes the carbon dioxide and replaces it with oxygen and then sends the blood back in and around the body, he says.

The study collected data on swine flu patients from all 15 centres that offer ECMO treatment in Australia and New Zealand.

Of the 5000 people infected with swine flu in Australia and New Zealand that needed hospitalisation, 61 required treatment with ECMO, he says.
Jones says that’s a significant increase on the amount of people who’ve required ECMO in the past.

“Last year only four patients across Australia and New Zealand required ECMO during winter.”

Young vulnerable

Jones says unlike seasonal influenza, swine flu affected many young adults.

“A substantial number of young people became very sick with pneumonia [due to] the virus or a secondary infection,” he says.

According to Jones, when patients become very short of breath and have respiratory failure, they’re put on a ventilator. If that doesn’t work, ECMO treatment is the last resort.

Paediatrician Professor Robert Booy, of the Children’s Hospital at Westmead in Sydney, says patients that require ECMO are “extremely unwell and teetering on death.”

Of the 61 swine flu patients treated with ECMO, 79% survived, which Booy says is “very impressive.”

Without ECMO, about 90% of people suffering from severe influenza associated respiratory failure would have died, he says.

But Booy says the current swine flu death rate statistics in Australia are “hiding” those saved from intensive care management.

“When we say we’ve had just under 200 deaths, the numbers could easily have been twice that, but for the fact we’ve got such high quality intensive care in Australia and New Zealand.”

Booy says the study is extremely important, and demonstrates that intensive care doctors across Australia and New Zealand have a “superb” network, which allows them to publish important research quickly.

Jones admits the study was unable to determine the survival rate of those with severe respiratory failure associated with swine flu who did not receive ECMO treatment.

Warning saved lives

He says Australian clinicians were “forewarned” of what to expect before swine flue arrived in Australia, by the experiences of doctors in Mexico and the US.

When the outbreak of swine flu was announced in Mexico, he says a lot of young people were presenting with severe pneumonia.

“They also reported a very high fatality rate per case of infection.”

Jones hopes their study will be of similar value to the Northern Hemisphere who have yet to experience swine flu outbreaks during winter.

“Given what we learned from the Mexican experience, we felt we had an obligation to reciprocally provide advanced warning for people in the north.”

An editorial also published in the latest edition of JAMA written by Dr Douglas White and Dr Derek Angus, both of the University of Pittsburgh, says any deaths from swine flu will be regrettable.

“But those that result from insufficient planning and inadequate preparation will be especially tragic.”


2,566 posted on 10/13/2009 6:29:58 AM PDT by DvdMom (Freeper Smokin' Joe does the freeper Avian / H1N1 Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2564 | View Replies ]


To: bethybabes69

Scotland:

40% rise in swine flu deaths in 48 hours as two more die

heraldscotland staff
Published on 12 Oct 2009
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/health/40-rise-in-swine-flu-deaths-in-48-hours-as-two-more-die-1.925845

The number of swine flu deaths in Scotland has soared by 40% in just 48 hours, after the Scottish Government confirmed last night that a further two people died after contracting the virus.

The patients, a 48-year-old man from Greater Glasgow and Clyde and an 81-year-old Fife woman, were both carrying the H1N1 strain.

Their deaths take the total swine flu fatalities to 14, marking a sudden increase in the number of deaths since Glasgow mother Jacqui Fletcher became the UK’s first swine flu victim in June.

On Sunday, it emerged a 42-year-old Glasgow man and a 75-year-old man from Grampian died after contracting the virus.

No further details about the latest victims would be released at the request of their families, the Government said.

While the 48-year-old patient had “significant underlying health conditions” that contributed to his death, H1N1 was a “contributory factor” in the death of the pensioner.

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said: “Our thoughts are with the families and friends of both patients, and I express my sincere condolences to everyone who knew them. In the vast majority of cases, most people have fairly mild symptoms and make a full recovery within a week.”

She added: “Vaccination is the best defence we have against the H1N1 virus and Scotland is preparing well for the first phase of the vaccination programme which is due to start later this month.”

Figures released last week showed the number of people being admitted to hospital in Scotland with swine flu has reached a record high.


2,568 posted on 10/13/2009 6:40:32 AM PDT by DvdMom (Freeper Smokin' Joe does the freeper Avian / H1N1 Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2566 | View Replies ]

To: DvdMom
How about we call it the Mexican Flu, K?

That's the naming convention which has been used in the past, and continuing to call it "swine flu" is misleading at best.

It's the MEXICAN FLU, folks.

And as far as I know, it's being OVERREPORTED like crazy right now.

I personally know two people who have probably had it, and many more who had regular, garden-variety flu. But many hospitals are just reporting EVERY flu case as H1N1, without any evidence whatsoever.

Why is this, the MEXICAN FLU, being treated this way?

How can we know what's really going on when there is such sloppy treatment of facts???

2,572 posted on 10/13/2009 6:43:25 AM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2566 | View Replies ]

To: DvdMom

THANKS FOR THE PINGS.


2,577 posted on 10/13/2009 7:02:32 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2566 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson